Hi,
i have to agree to two strange things happen with the 16.
1. In oposide to all other heavyer wingloaded planes, the 16 with its clipped wings(smaler wingarea) keep more energy than the normal winged Spits.
2. The 16 have a even more smooth stall behaviour than the normal winged Spits.
To 1. this is absolut ok, so there is nothing strange, its rather strange this behaviour dont count for even more heavy wingloaded planes!! A FW190A8 or a P38(no flaps) bleed energy like mad while the smothest turn. That the 16 dont bleed energy like mad simply dont fit into this line!
To 2.
The 16 should lose much of the typical Spit turnperformence at slow speed, but specialy it should tend to be very unstable.
The CW spit had a VERY smal aspectratio, with this and the missing washout effect, it should be much more dangerus(if i remember right thats what the pilots was complaining).
btw, the good slowspeed acceleration of the 16 is related to a horizontal flight and climb, while a dive the relation should shift much toward the planes with a better drag/load.
And of course a F4U-4 can do all better than the 16, due to its magical flaps.
All over the 16 is far less overmodeled than the F4U´s(due to the magical flaps), the La7 and HurriIIc.
Another btw. a much more tight turning 16(than a Seafire), can be related to a different fuelload.
I would like to see that the E-bleed get more credible all over. Heavy wingloaded planes should keep energy like mad while highspeed manouvers and i hate the magical flaps, which particular help to overcome the high e-bleed in some heavy planes.
Greetings,
Knegel