Author Topic: "Jaggies" (Read 264 times)

Mak333 · « **on:** April 23, 2007, 10:48:18 AM »

I put this term in quotes, because I do not believe it should be a term used today relating to graphics.

Many people these days, mainly the young ones are expressing their feelings towards low resolution graphics and no anti-aliasing features.

If you choose to Wikipedia the term "Jaggies" it will give you a definition similar to this:

An informal term to describe jagged edges on a display. This happens due to low resolution as I said before, and the lack of anti-aliasing.

Does anyone use this noobish term here?

Am I the only one who is embarrassed by the fact that people actually say "Jaggies" and not jagged edges or lines?

The term just seems so childish to me...

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #1 on:** April 23, 2007, 10:53:05 AM »

Jaggies are in museum just like knives to cut the bread.

rpm · « **Reply #2 on:** April 23, 2007, 10:58:33 AM »

I thought that was a Catherine Bell fanclub.

Slash27 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 23, 2007, 11:21:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
I thought that was a Catherine Bell fanclub.

I should join one of those.

Dux · « **Reply #4 on:** April 23, 2007, 12:18:58 PM »

Noobish...? I dunno about that. They used that term back in the '80s before antialiasing was mainstream... there was even a piece of software you could buy called "Jaggies Are Gone".

Though, I know what you mean about terms that just seem out of place in this day and age... "clicker" is the one I can't stand.

Phaser11 · « **Reply #5 on:** April 23, 2007, 12:24:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
I thought that was a Catherine Bell fanclub.

I'm in!

Can I say that?

megadud · « **Reply #6 on:** April 23, 2007, 02:30:09 PM »

i hate the term bodunkadunk. i mean how did they get bodunkadunk out of prettythang or butt or booty. It makes no sense!

i hate these stupid words that have nothing to do with what they mean. first of all it is too many sillibles and secondly it is just stupid, i am outraged!