yep we sure did, i bet it was there fault the last time, when they all died! so how many volcano's do you think it would take, at once, to equal what you say we are doing? by the way of the 3600 climatologist that signed on to mmgw over half of them now say they didn't understand how the science came to that conclusion but went along with the results anyway! yet 34000 have signed that it does not exist and of that group 9600 are phd's, (roughly of course) what would it take for the earth to rid itself of us, an asteroid, 4 volcano's at the same time, a major shift in its axis????
?
Sadly, you and Lazs must read the same newspaper. You really should delve a little deeper into that document that you and Lazs spout off as having any sort of clout on the issue. When you do, and find false individuals listed on it (like I did)(Unless there is an R2D2 AND a C3PO really alive out there, which were two of the many ficticious names on it) as well as individuals who proport to be climatologists.... yet their degrees are in textiles... you might find out how stupid you really are in using this document in any support to your argument. (But you won't listen to that)
In the end you'll believe it has something to do with America being taken over by Russian or Iranians or whomever.... or other conspiracies you can dream up or read on your rediculous websites. I suggest you do a little research into the priciple of Acchem's Razor, a scientific tenet for hundreds of years.
With no disrespect intended, you really should look into deciphering information from true sources, then deciding upon your opinion, rather then deciding upon your opinion then looking for information in biased sources, which support your pre-conceived opinion.
I recommend you seriously look into
http://realclimate.org/ to start out with. It's filled with climatologists that actually DO the work, not just claim to, which you can look up, and actually check the numbers.
After that, move onto governmental sites required by oversight to post their numbers publically, most online. NOAA and the Earth System Research Laboratory are excellent sources. I do have access to more sets of data, but I am employed by a federal research institution.