Author Topic: Ann Coulter Endorses Hillary!!! (Read 1100 times)

TwentyFo · « **on:** February 01, 2008, 11:47:18 AM »

Did hell just freeze over?

Ann Coulter Endorses Hillary

john9001 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 01, 2008, 11:49:54 AM »

oh, now suddenly you like coulter, what about it's adam's apple?

TwentyFo · « **Reply #2 on:** February 01, 2008, 11:56:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
oh, now suddenly you like coulter, what about it's adam's apple?

If you are referring to me, I don't like Coulter at all. I just thought it was surprising.

2bighorn · « **Reply #3 on:** February 01, 2008, 11:58:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
what about it's adam's apple?

Lazs would hit it. Hillary or no...

Sandman · « **Reply #4 on:** February 01, 2008, 12:08:48 PM »

I hear Michelle Malkin isn't too keen on McCain either.

bsdaddict · « **Reply #5 on:** February 01, 2008, 12:39:40 PM »

yeah she bashed him on Glenn Beck's show...

Yeager · « **Reply #6 on:** February 01, 2008, 01:16:52 PM »

I hear Michelle Malkin isn't too keen on McCain either.
====
is she a babe? That would suck to have a babe not support you

edit: oh that little pillopino gal......shes cute. Why she doggen on my boy McCain?

bsdaddict · « **Reply #7 on:** February 01, 2008, 01:35:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
Why she doggen on my boy McCain?

read for yourself...

just some little issues like his track record on amnesty for illegals, support for planned parenthood, being a global warming fearmonger, stuff like that. Not anything that should get any conservative's panties in a bunch...

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #8 on:** February 01, 2008, 01:56:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
I hear Michelle Malkin isn't too keen on McCain either.
====
is she a babe? That would suck to have a babe not support you

edit: oh that little pillopino gal......shes cute. Why she doggen on my boy McCain?

Because when it gets down to it, McCain is not a conservative. Most conservatives hate McCain for the same reasons as most liberals hate Lieberman.

FrodeMk3 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:13:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by bsdaddict
read for yourself...

just some little issues like his track record on amnesty for illegals, support for planned parenthood, being a global warming fearmonger, stuff like that. Not anything that should get any conservative's panties in a bunch...

Way too true...But Coulter endorsing Hillary was completely out of left field, to be sure.

What's funny is, is that Coulter has more to lose, than Hillary has to gain. Having a Neo-con mouthpiece like Coulter endorse you means that...You are actually a neo-con too? Or that there really is a parallel agenda between both parties, and that the best proof is right here? Kinda interesting.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:21:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FrodeMk3
Way too true...But Coulter endorsing Hillary was completely out of left field, to be sure.

What's funny is, is that Coulter has more to lose, than Hillary has to gain. Having a Neo-con mouthpiece like Coulter endorse you means that...You are actually a neo-con too? Or that there really is a parallel agenda between both parties, and that the best proof is right here? Kinda interesting.

People quite aren't really understanding what's going on here.

Coulter isn't saying that she's supporting Clinton. She's saying that McCain is more liberal than Clinton.

bsdaddict · « **Reply #11 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:24:31 PM »

exactly. she's not going to play into the partizan game. given the choice between candidate A and candidate B, she'll support the more conservative of the two. If A is McCain and B is Hillary, then B get's her vote. If only we had a candidate who was a real conservative...

FrodeMk3 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:26:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
People quite aren't really understanding what's going on here.

Coulter isn't saying that she's supporting Clinton. She's saying that McCain is more liberal than Clinton.

She said in the vid, that she would actually campaign for Clinton, if that's what it took to defeat McCain.

However...If conservatism is what she touts, then why didn't she support RP, or any of the other Rep. candidates? Why try to go Dem.? It really doesn't make any sense.

FrodeMk3 · « **Reply #13 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:30:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by bsdaddict
exactly. she's not going to play into the partizan game. given the choice between candidate A and candidate B, she'll support the more conservative of the two. If A is McCain and B is Hillary, then B get's her vote. If only we had a candidate who was a real conservative...

Yeah, But Hillary's no conservative. As a matter of fact, how many of you here believe that a Hillary Clinton administration will be any different from that of Bill Clinton's? She's actually got a track record of what she's done, in that regard.

However, if McCain really is that suspect, then how come the GOP hasn't cut his legs' out from under him yet, if he's so out of line?

Airscrew · « **Reply #14 on:** February 01, 2008, 02:34:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FrodeMk3
However, if McCain really is that suspect, then how come the GOP hasn't cut his legs' out from under him yet, if he's so out of line?

Because the GOP only cares about winning even if its McCain...