« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Remodeled me110s and new 410  (Read 2445 times)

Offline sunfan1121

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2051
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #30 on: February 07, 2008, 11:29:52 AM »
LAME
Logged
A drunk driver will run a stop sign. A stoned driver will stop until it turns green.

Offline Angrist

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 430
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #31 on: February 07, 2008, 11:35:11 AM »
that was wrong....

funny, but wrong....:huh


and yeah..allied only updates suck!
Logged

Offline republic

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1416
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #32 on: February 07, 2008, 12:12:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Hrm... good point.

Allies:

B-24
T-34
P-47N
Redo old 47s
P-38J
Redo old P-38s
Redo old P-51s
F4U-1A
Redo old F4Us
Spit8
Spit16
Redo old spits
B-25C
B-25H
B-17G
P-39D
P-39Q
Redo LA5
Redo LA7
Sherman Firefly VC

Axis:
Ki-84
109G14
Redo 109s (F4, G6, K4 all lose options)
Redo 190s (skipped ta152 entirely, mess up ENY rating on A8/A5)


Wow, thanks for the list Krusty.  I was hoping the allied favoritism was only a recent thing since I joined but...apparently it's endemic.

As discussed before.  We have most of the top end, so from now on it's all about filling in the gaps.  Some great Italian, Japanese, and yes even German planes are still waiting for the spotlight.
Logged
P-47 pilot

Offline trax1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3973
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #33 on: February 07, 2008, 12:20:43 PM »
Damn you TK....I've been waiting for the 410 for awhile now.:(
Logged
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #34 on: February 07, 2008, 01:01:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Hrm... good point.

Allies:

B-24
T-34
P-47N
Redo old 47s
P-38J
Redo old P-38s
Redo old P-51s
F4U-1A
Redo old F4Us
Spit8
Spit16
Redo old spits
B-25C
B-25H
B-17G
P-39D
P-39Q
Redo LA5
Redo LA7
Sherman Firefly VC

Axis:
Ki-84
109G14
Redo 109s (F4, G6, K4 all lose options)
Redo 190s (skipped ta152 entirely, mess up ENY rating on A8/A5)


Don't get me wrong the VVS planeset is really hurting and the P-39s will help in a major way, but there are other planesets hurting even more, and mostly they're axis.


You could point out that most of these' are mid-to-late war planes' as well, Krusty. There is an immense amount of ground to cover in the Early to Mid war set. Especially as we now have an arena dedicated to it.

I know HTC and crew are trying to throw us some new planes; I'm grateful for what we do get.

I know that they have other projects' in the fire at the same time (Combat Tour) and that they can't devote all of their time to new A/C or other additions' to the current AH.

I just think that the Current game, with the planeset (and GV set) filled in, would more that make up for the mothballing of CT. Give it some more choices' in gameplay, A fuller GV set, with EW, MW, and LW AFV's. Give the GV's a damage model (When they get tracked, show them losing a track.) Change the CV groups-Make them country specific( Some ports' spawn an Essex class Fleet carrier, some spawn a Shokaku, some a Graf Zeppelin...)

I've always seen AH as having a lot of potential. I just wish we could see more of it.
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #35 on: February 07, 2008, 01:08:31 PM »
I'm rather happy that the last update (B-25s) and the next update (P-39s) both have early planes included. Keep down that route and we'll have the planeset holes filled in, in no time!
Logged

Offline MjTalon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2587
      • 82nd FG Home
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #36 on: February 07, 2008, 01:09:23 PM »
lmao :lol !

He got me :o .
Logged

S.A.P.P.
Cavalier - 82nd F.G
Group Commanding Officer

Offline republic

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1416
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #37 on: February 07, 2008, 01:22:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Keep down that route and we'll have the planeset holes filled in, in no time!


Albeit the allied holes...
Logged
P-47 pilot

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #38 on: February 07, 2008, 01:24:19 PM »
WTFBTGH? Where's mah tailgunnerz gondlas, dont see em???

Iz taht a 50mm gannon I see portuding in middle???

OMGOMGOMG!!!!

-C+
Logged
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #39 on: February 07, 2008, 01:25:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FrodeMk3
I just think that the Current game, with the planeset (and GV set) filled in, would more that make up for the mothballing of CT. Give it some more choices' in gameplay, A fuller GV set, with EW, MW, and LW AFV's. Give the GV's a damage model (When they get tracked, show them losing a track.) Change the CV groups-Make them country specific( Some ports' spawn an Essex class Fleet carrier, some spawn a Shokaku, some a Graf Zeppelin...)
[/b]
Nah..  The MA just can't have any sort of real strat.  Gameplay maybe, but never any real strategy mechanics that don't get abused and consequently dumbed down for foolproofing from dive bombing formations & co.  
More planes and task group types, mobile and towed artillery, recon or pilot rescue (snoozer IMO but a good addition nonetheless), all those things will make the MA even more fun, but they won't be enough to keep gameplay quality from degrading.
Quote
I've always seen AH as having a lot of potential. I just wish we could see more of it. [/B]

And CT is it, it has to happen.  It'll allow the MA to be what it's supposed to be, rather than try and compromise for all the different things different players want from AH.
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #40 on: February 07, 2008, 01:26:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Hrm... good point.

Allies:

B-24
T-34
P-47N
Redo old 47s
P-38J
Redo old P-38s
Redo old P-51s
F4U-1A
Redo old F4Us
Spit8
Spit16
Redo old spits
B-25C
B-25H
B-17G
P-39D
P-39Q
Redo LA5
Redo LA7
Sherman Firefly VC

Axis:
Ki-84
109G14
Redo 109s (F4, G6, K4 all lose options)
Redo 190s (skipped ta152 entirely, mess up ENY rating on A8/A5)

 


You forgot the A-26!!!!!!!   :cry :cry

And the PBY Catalina  :( :cry
Logged
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline MotleyCH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 633
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #41 on: February 07, 2008, 01:28:21 PM »
Can't believe I fell for this, nice one. I was getting ready to reskin my Bf-110 G2s..

Logged

Offline MotleyCH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 633
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #42 on: February 07, 2008, 01:33:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FrodeMk3

I know that they have other projects' in the fire at the same time (Combat Tour) and that they can't devote all of their time to new A/C or other additions' to the current AH.

 


Well the BF-110 should be in that line-up for CT....as well as the Stuka I guess..
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #43 on: February 07, 2008, 02:11:07 PM »
Krusty, you forgot the P-38G, B-24J and Jeep.  Also the F4U-1C was not remodeled due to pending perk loadout system.  And if you are listing options taken away, the Spitfire Mk Vb was gutted performancewise and ammowise.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Remodeled me110s and new 410
« Reply #44 on: February 07, 2008, 02:12:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot

Nah..  The MA just can't have any sort of real strat.  Gameplay maybe, but never any real strategy mechanics that don't get abused and consequently dumbed down for foolproofing from dive bombing formations & co.  
More planes and task group types, mobile and towed artillery, recon or pilot rescue (snoozer IMO but a good addition nonetheless), all those things will make the MA even more fun, but they won't be enough to keep gameplay quality from degrading.
 
And CT is it, it has to happen.  It'll allow the MA to be what it's supposed to be, rather than try and compromise for all the different things different players want from AH.


I'll make only one counterpoint (because the way the community's split over this issue, I wholeheartedly agree with you) and that is this. If it happened to the MA, what is to stop it from happening with CT?

Either CT is going to fall pray to 'gaming the game', or It is going to have very few players. Which is what befell the AvA before the current setup. The AvA staff is cheering because they have as many as 60 players' in there at a time now. But instead of following a strictly historical match, they have given some leeway, and are letting the Allied and Axis CO's choose which aircraft they use, and are making them record what fields' are taken, etc. There are points' given for captures, giving a new aspect to the 'capture the flag' aspect of the game. But they did that by allowing choice. If you take the choices' out, which the MA's have, what's left over? My understanding of CT is that it has a role-playing aspect. Ok...We currently have that with many of the squads' in-game right now. How is CT gonna improve on that, if at all?

I'm sorry Moot. I just don't see CT as the Holy Grail everyone thinks' it's supposed to be.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2008, 02:15:48 PM by FrodeMk3 »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »