Author Topic: Ordanance damage realism?  (Read 1006 times)

Offline Simaril

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Ordanance damage realism?
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2008, 03:07:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Fugitive
A FH or VH is simulating more than just a building. You need the extra poundage to cover things like parts, equipment, mechanics, the coffee pot..... you know, all those things needed to take care of the planes  or vehicles


You guys are missing Pyro's point.

The hangar is NOT a simulation of a hangar, or its supplies, or its support staff. Hangars and strats are ONLY ICONS that represent the ability to perform specific in game functions. The barracks aren't barracks or bomb shelters, they're markers for the ability to take bases with attacks launched from that base. Shoot, BASES are only icons for chunks of artificial real estate!

Best keep in mind -- AH is a flight simulator, but a tactical GAME.
Maturity is knowing that I've been an idiot in the past.
Wisdom is realizing I will be an idiot in the future.
Common sense is trying to not be an idiot right now

"Social Fads are for sheeple." - Meatwad

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Ordanance damage realism?
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2008, 03:10:44 PM »
^-- read his post.

Realistically, if somebody bombed a shed somewhere, the base still ran missions. Doesn't matter if 1 plane was in that shed, 50+ more were dispersed in the trees, armored bunkers, scattered so widely that bombing 1 would not damage the other, etc.

Historically nobody ever put a field out of commission by dropping a bomb on a single building.


This is just an element of gameplay. I guess it's too hard to capture a field with the hangars up.


P.S. Capturing fields is also just a gameplay element! It's not MEANT to be historic!

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15695
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Ordanance damage realism?
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2008, 03:15:42 PM »
If anything the ord amount should be raised. Personally I think it is fine where it is. You get a set of lancs or 3 and you take down multi-fields.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Re: Ordanance damage realism?
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2008, 04:45:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tommy Flanagan
"A FH or VH goes down with 2k for me.

And Morgan Fairchild is my wife. Yeah! That's the ticket!"

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Re: Re: Ordanance damage realism?
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2008, 06:18:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SFCHONDO
2000 tries before you hit it you mean? ......LOL
When you post, I get to look at those "ta-ta's"    
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC