Author Topic: Is McCain another Bill Clinton?? (Read 981 times)

SIG220 · « **on:** February 21, 2008, 02:27:04 AM »

Several investigative reporters from the New York Times have been working on uncovering a possible extra-martial affair that John McCain had with a woman 31 years his junior 8 years ago when he first ran for President back in 2000.

They have unearthed a wealth of evidence pointing to a possible romantic relationship between the two that took place back then.

Should this matter? Are ethics and morality especially relevant in light of McCain's history of fighting for ethics reform? Must a President be faithful to his spouse, in order for the country to trust him to be faithful to the American people?? What about Clinton's affairs? What about ones that we now know that Presidents Kennedy, Eisenhower, and Franklin Roosevelt all had??

Here is a link to the NY Times investigative report, and the evidence they have discovered:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html

Or is this perhaps a dirty political witch hunt, only coming out now that McCain is all but assured the Republican nomination??

SD67 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 21, 2008, 02:32:41 AM »

I couldn't be worse than an asexual president who helped cover up her husband's extra-marital affairs for political reasons now could it?

SIG220 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 21, 2008, 02:39:58 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SD67
I couldn't be worse than an asexual president who helped cover up her husband's extra-marital affairs for political reasons now could it?

So are you saying that she is not telling the truth when she says that she believed Bill when he said that he was innocent all of those many years?? And did not know that he was really cheating??

rpm · « **Reply #3 on:** February 21, 2008, 02:40:46 AM »

ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz......

SD67 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 21, 2008, 03:47:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SIG220
So are you saying that she is not telling the truth when she says that she believed Bill when he said that he was innocent all of those many years?? And did not know that he was really cheating??

Apart from the oblivious sarcasm dripping from the comment, there is ample evidence that shows Hillary knew of Bill's indiscretions. She was even known to comment on them, sometimes in inappropriate circumstances.
By having this knowledge she also was therefore complicit in helping to cover them up in the face of the general public.

moot · « **Reply #5 on:** February 21, 2008, 04:48:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz......

SIG220 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 21, 2008, 05:03:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
ZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz......

You mean you are not interested in what the candidates are doing in their bedrooms???

Tango · « **Reply #7 on:** February 21, 2008, 05:16:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SIG220
You mean you are not interested in what the candidates are doing in their bedrooms???

New York Times??????

They haven't a clue about anything thats going on in the real world, much less McCain's bedroom.

sunfan1121 · « **Reply #8 on:** February 21, 2008, 05:24:36 AM »

There are almost no sources to say this is true

midnight Target · « **Reply #9 on:** February 21, 2008, 07:18:37 AM »

This kind of crap almost makes me want to vote for McCain.

Eagler · « **Reply #10 on:** February 21, 2008, 08:28:25 AM »

lefty ny times smear tactic .. plain and simple

lazs2 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 21, 2008, 08:33:29 AM »

I'm not interested in what the candidates are doing in their bedroom. I am interested in what they are doing on the job in their office and.. if they lie under oath about it.

If you get caught having sex in your office with an underling or.. anyone for that matter.... I bet you get fired.

lazs

Sikboy · « **Reply #12 on:** February 21, 2008, 08:42:30 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
This kind of crap almost makes me want to vote for McCain.

I think it's just a counter to the Obama Drug fueled gay sex allegation.

-Sik

SOB · « **Reply #13 on:** February 21, 2008, 09:07:16 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SIG220
You mean you are not interested in what the candidates are doing in their bedrooms???

No.

Delirium · « **Reply #14 on:** February 21, 2008, 09:16:34 AM »

Something smells really wrong with both their un-named sources and their timing. Why didn't they run this back in December when the article was actually written?

Imho, someone is pulling the NY Times' strings...

Here is another news story for you;

"The New York Times Is Full of Crap" according to source.