What's funny is the continual red herring of racism being slapped about in Obama's name.
Obama hasn't been called a racist. Wright has been called and clearly is a racist.
The real issue, the one that is really at the heart of this, is why Obama would associate so closely with Wright for 20 years. When Obama's "Just Words" speech is compared to Obama's actions in relations to Wright's words, there is a major disconnect. The man who would unite us all and help us move forward into the grand, new era of race neutral American social relationships is a close associate of one of the very worst examples of racism from the religious pulpit?
Is this the example of Obama's "Change we can believe in" that we're all supposed to worship? Saying one thing and clearly doing the opposite?
Of course, for obvious reasons, that issue can't be addressed by Obama's supporters or by those who objectively 
find that anyone saying anything negative against Obama is a racist.
Well did Obama himself say it> Some speak as if he wrote the script for the minister without actually saying it. That's the smoke cloud that's being used and that's the part where some insist we are missing half our brains.
You guys ARE in fact using guilt by association in it's most elementary form.
You're blaming Obama for what someone else said, and that IS in fact stupid. McCain is a Bush cronie should we auto assume he will destroy the economy and war like Bush and his associates did, I mean it is guilt by association game we are playing here, without saying we are.
I can flip some HUGE massive tables in the other direction if you REALLY want a heated debate blaming someone for what someone else did. Let me know, it's not rocket science.
I never said I was FOR Obama (you assume that because some who have white knuckle death grip on >PARTY<)I'm just calling this ridiculous situation as I see it. Half-truths and half-baked to create sensationalism and doubt in the air.... like Arlo said out of fear. It's weak, it's grasping at straws at best and if this is all there is,.. you just talked me into voting for him. Ya gotta come up with something better then this, unless you're counting on everyone sticking a needle in their brains.
Voting strictly party line is how this country took a nose dive, and I usually call it tunnel vision but lately I call it pin-hole vision.
Just saying. The more the issue is defended the more ridiculous it (and the supporters of party political tripe) looks.
No one has answered my questions with any intelligent return, but great evasion I'll give em that. YA we don't want to converse about true factual details we want to focus on assumption and speculation and the party line, yours.
He didn't say it, you don't even know if he was there to walk out, and NO ONE can report to me what their church is doing minute to minute since you demand the same of him. All the important questions are ignored or slithered over. Not one attempt to answer any of them. Except in doing so it would start to make sense and we don't want that.
Arlo hit the nail on the head and drove it home. IMO
