How is it possible for an anti-racist to defend a racism?
That was a trick question. It isn't possible.
Well thanks for speaking for me, but I prefer to do it on my own.
It takes alot of energy to consume one's self with ignoring common logic to purposely always end up with the same result. "He's guilty". I'm not saying YOU are racist. I am saying some responding may not realize they may be.
Is it really political or is it because he's black? The political can only be fear and any other excuse\agenda to completely ignore common logic could only be racism. You just can't purposely ignore important evidence with out an effort and self-serving agenda. You don't need an effort if you're being honest, especially with yourself. Truth stands on it's own with no pushing at all.
And we return to my 3 questions again.
A major point here is not one single person attacking Obama will even attempt to answer them. They\you just slip and slide around the issue and slow-walk yourself past them trying to use the same reasoning we started with when I asked them. Yall speak this stuff like it's proven fact, yet no on can answer one question.
It's a circle jerk. If you ignore them then your theories are sharply flawed and you know it. Now they're just arguing to "win",..OR they know nothing about what they say. And basically >IMO< pushing pure nonsense.
Even the opposing politicians refuse to tackle those questions, because the out-come spells "idiot". It's all political tripe, white wash, and smoke screen. It's the only thing people against Dems and\or Obama have and it's damn weak. I'd be embarrassed to push such idiocy. If I were out to discredit someone it would definantly have to be much better then this. All I see is half-baked speculation based on half-truths, and bent fish hooks.
I certainly would NOT use it as my best ammo. <shrug> But if that's all they got then they HAVE to get silly with it. Problem is it's VERY transparent. I think the only people being fooled by it are the people pushing it thinking other's are actually swallowing it. <shrug>
In a nut shell yall bit the hook line and sinker.
Just because the rest of us choose to at least view common sense, doesn't mean we are trying to hide anything. The accusing side of things is ignoring everything but what they want you to believe, like a bad prosecutor.
If it were in court it would be thrown out because you're not presenting anything in a form of evidence other then hear-say and assumption.
NOW, if this were to be about Billary being held down by sniper fire I'd be behind you every step of the way, waving flags, firing flare guns but this subject is just ridiculous. It really is an insult to intelligence of any kind.
>IMO<
Sorry but it's just true. <S>
