E25280,
My point is that SIK saying the 1906 quake, and San Andreas in general, was more devastating because the damage was confined to a smaller area is incorrect. As I said before, the only thing that's kept the devastation caused by the New Madrid fault to a minimum is the fact that the population density and level of urbanization is significantly less than the inhabited areas along the San Andreas.
The other problem, getting to what laser is saying, is that New Madrid isn't just a fault line but a failed continental rift. It's been more or less good fortune over the past few million years the continent hasn't been ripped in half and the Mississippi River hasn't turned into a SEA, which NEARLY happened on several occasions already (one such incident is what helped form Lake Superior).