I didn't come out the loser. You lost for supporting a plane thats wings burn off in 90 seconds if an engine fire erupts. I realized that you are a moron and lost any motivation for talking to you. Its not my job to convince you of anything.
And here I thought all this time you were just playing dense.
You lost this argument because you failed to prove the following:
The B-32 was a viable alternative and contender to the B-29
The B-36 was a viable alternative and contender to the B-29
The XB-30 was a viable alternative and contender to the B-29
The XB-31 was a viable alternative and contender to the B-29
I, along with quite a few others have never denied the B-29 had any issues, we just didn't agree with your point that those planes you mentioned were an alternative to the B-29 that could have done a better job. I posted some information that was counter to your argument and instead of replying with facts to shore up your position you created straw man arguments.
Yeah, I'd say you lost this one. Frankly, I am surprised that you're not used to this by now.
ack-ack