Author Topic: Kursk: why not?  (Read 637 times)

Offline sparow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
      • http://249sqn.wordpress.com/
Kursk: why not?
« on: July 24, 2008, 04:42:13 PM »
Why not Kursk?
Sparow
249 Sqn RAF "Gold Coast"
Consistently beeing shot down since Tour 33 (MA) and Tour 8  (CT/AvA)

Visit us at http://249sqn.wordpress.com/

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2008, 07:02:55 AM »
There's no map covering that area and there's a severe lack of soviet equipment, primarily a/c, in the game.

I'd love a Kursk scenario.

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline sldered

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 99
      • 49th Fighter Group
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2008, 04:11:31 PM »
That would be a very fun camapign
  CALLSIGN: Slider26     49th FG  7th FS.  S.A.P.P P-38 flyer

Offline Dux

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7333
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2008, 10:25:13 AM »
There's no map covering that area...

Actually, there is one in the oven. Give it a few months. :)
Rogue Squadron, CO
5th AF, FSO Squadron, Member

We all have a blind date with Destiny... and it looks like she's ordered the lobster.

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2008, 12:34:39 PM »
 :aok :aok

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2008, 01:31:17 PM »
Actually, there is one in the oven. Give it a few months. :)
Sweet!
Now if only we had more Yak's...

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12386
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2008, 03:28:58 PM »
here ya go

moving up from sheep? :D
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline Chilli

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2008, 03:38:52 PM »
mmmmmmm   handles :aok :aok  :lol

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Kursk: why not?
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2008, 11:44:10 PM »
You are a very bad man, Chili.

You made me lol.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB