NRA tagged spying against anti-gun groups

[Hangtime]

This one cracks me up... I applaud the NRA; <golf clap> but find the 'spy' pretty lame.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5541490&page=1

Fer god's sake; she's into 'pugil stick fighting'... ROFL!

... makes me wonder what kind of nutballs the the anti-gun groups have spying on us.

[crockett]

This one cracks me up... I applaud the NRA; <golf clap> but find the 'spy' pretty lame.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5541490&page=1

Fer god's sake; she's into 'pugil stick fighting'... ROFL!

... makes me wonder what kind of nutballs the the anti-gun groups have spying on us.

Funny that a group so bent on supposedly protecting people's rights is so easily willing to crap all over other people's rights, who disagree with them.

[Elfie]

makes me wonder what kind of nutballs the the anti-gun groups have spying on us.

Not saying its right by any means.......but anyone who thinks that kind of thing doesn't go both ways is pretty naive.

I knew a young guy a few years back that was an animal rights activist. He faked applying for a job at a slaughter house just so he could discretely film stuff going on when they gave him the plant tour. The guy was kinda out there beyond left field..... 

[Elfie]

Funny that a group so bent on supposedly protecting people's rights is so easily willing to crap all over other people's rights, who disagree with them.

Exactly which rights is the NRA crapping all over? They very well may be breaking some lobbying laws....but which rights are they crapping on?

[Leslie]

I'm glad anti-gun groups are being spied upon.  They need to be if for no other reason they want to disarm everybody.  I support the NRA by this action 100%.  Gun control is too important an issue not to play hard ball.  Both sides do it and this type of spying has gone on for thousands of years.  I personally want to know everything I can find out about a dangerous opponent, such as the freedom deniers. 




Les

[Chalenge]

The victorious strategist only seeks battle after the victory has been won, whereas he who is destined to defeat first fights and afterwards looks for victory. - Sun Tzu


We cannot enter into alliances until we are acquainted with the designs of our neighbors. - Sun Tzu

[Maverick]

Gee of course the anti gun folks don;'tr have anything to do with the NRA. Naah none of them would buy a membership to keep tabs on the NRA......

Kinda like the anti hunting folks who try to buy as many game tags as they can to keep hunters from getting them. Or applying for the hunting tag lottery so that a hunter would be denied a permit.

Yawn, big fat hairy deal. Both sides engage in checking each other out. The anti's are just crying now since they lost the supreme court ruling.

[Leslie]

Lautenberg wants to use taxpayer money to investigate legitimate strategy on the part of the NRA, which is checking their every political move.  The NRA is doing this in my interest because I'm a member and this is what I want them to do.

On the other hand, Lautenberg wants to use taxpayer money to do his bidding (what Senate hearing is necessary for something like this?), so he is also using my taxes for his political purpose.  I'm paying for both, one means indirectly and the other because I wish to.  And that is the difference here.  I wouldn't be surprized if the NRA memberships by any "anti" moles weren't paid using taxpayer money.  But I will leave it at that, since I have no proof.  If they were then I think that would be a dishonorable thing to do. 




Les

[rabbidrabbit]

Funny that a group so bent on supposedly protecting people's rights is so easily willing to crap all over other people's rights, who disagree with them.

OK, Tell me how anyones rights were violated?  Anything illegal?  Unless I'm missing anything, A low class partisan hack is calling out the NRA for paying someone to inform on an opponents action.  Something he would applaud if the sides were reversed.  The funny part is she was getting paid by the NRA to act against their interest as part of her cover. 

[Dago]

I wish before people get all indignant and up on a high horse over this, it might be worth considering there has only been an allegation by MotherJones Magazine, and no proof has been offered, guilt not admitted.

It's always possible this whole thing was a setup to make the NRA look bad.

[AKIron]

If the NRA weren't studying the enemy I'd want my membership dues back.

[Ripsnort]

OK, Tell me how anyones rights were violated?  Anything illegal?  Unless I'm missing anything, A low class partisan hack is calling out the NRA for paying someone to inform on an opponents action.  Something he would applaud if the sides were reversed.  The funny part is she was getting paid by the NRA to act against their interest as part of her cover. 

crockett won't be back. It's a hit and run post.

Ironically, with the 2nd amendment, and groups like the NRA, he wouldn't even be allowed to post on the USA innernets.

[Elfie]

the USA innernets.

Rip.....I just gotta ask....what the heck is an innernets and is it only in the USA?


 

[Jester]

If the NRA weren't studying the enemy I'd want my membership dues back.

What that man said.   

[Slamfire]

I would not put any stock in anything Frank Lautenberg says regarding the NRA.

Lautenberg is one of the Senate's most militant left wing members. He is an extremist pro-choice/gun banner.  Furthermore, Lautenberg is up for re-election, so he's looking to to put his name in the headlines.