« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: The lancasters grand slam bomb  (Read 983 times)

Offline opposum

  • Probation
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: The lancasters grand slam bomb
« Reply #30 on: August 20, 2008, 08:25:20 PM »
Quote from: SmokinLoon on August 20, 2008, 12:15:25 AM

Outside the HQ, nothing else takes more than 3k of bombs to be destroyed.


shor batts take 4000lbs  :rofl
Logged
/_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: The lancasters grand slam bomb
« Reply #31 on: August 20, 2008, 08:29:15 PM »
No wonder I can never kill the damn things.
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: The lancasters grand slam bomb
« Reply #32 on: August 21, 2008, 04:14:52 AM »
Quote from: opposum on August 20, 2008, 08:25:20 PM

shor batts take 4000lbs  :rofl

thougt it was 6K
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: The lancasters grand slam bomb
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2008, 05:13:37 PM »
Please people, read carefully what I am about to type:

HTC has already stated they will not add any ordnance heavier than 4,000 pounds.

Thank you very much.
Logged
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »