Author Topic: IL2  (Read 1821 times)

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15641
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: IL2
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2008, 04:34:09 PM »
I actually like the smaller cannons, prefer the lighter weight.
1/1000.

Need perked 37mms. Please. Begging you.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: IL2
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2008, 04:40:11 PM »
Not only are the cannons uber the thing is immune to pintle gun fire.

I've never downed one with just the pintle gun, but I have hit the engine oil numerous times.  It has been my experience that once you smoke their engine, they either RTB (giving you a little time) or they end up auguring because of their reduced visibilty and you get the assist because somebody else put more rounds into him already  :O.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: IL2
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2008, 05:03:14 PM »
I don't even bother tanking near airfields anymore, even if it looks like a fun fight.

Il-2 needs a small perk.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: IL2
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2008, 05:08:36 PM »
I don't even bother tanking near airfields anymore, even if it looks like a fun fight.

Il-2 needs a small perk.
Il-2 is fodder for any fighter.  You need air cover.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: IL2
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2008, 05:12:34 PM »
Il-2 is fodder for any fighter.  You need air cover.

Fighters ignore noe Il-2s when there are higher bandits.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: IL2
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2008, 05:23:02 PM »
Il-2 is fodder for any fighter.  You need air cover.

I was dogfighting a N1K in an IL-2 over one of our VB's one night.  He finally got me but it took about 5-10 minutes.  The IL-2's not a bad turn fighter but a little help is nice.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: IL2
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2008, 05:34:29 PM »

Better then bombs. You can take a tiger out in one pass with the IL-2's uber taters. On the other hand it takes great aim to kill a tiger with bombs unless you dive bomb it with heavys.

B-25H can kill a Tiger or T-34 in one shot as well. 

The problem isn't the IL2 but rather with the tank not having air support attacking a position that does.  Sounds like bad planning to me.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline dunnrite

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
Re: IL2
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2008, 05:57:00 PM »
BS I can normally hit 3 rounds of the 75 mil in one pass in the b25, but one shot?
Amazing you could actually recruit that much suck into one squad.
Your Proctologist called, they found your head.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: IL2
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2008, 06:15:54 PM »
BS I can normally hit 3 rounds of the 75 mil in one pass in the b25, but one shot?

Can and have 1 shot tigers. :aok
See Rule #4

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
Re: IL2
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2008, 06:26:19 PM »
the il2 isnt that great of a ground atack when you have fighters shooting down the il unless they try to ho you in which case is a bad decision i have had countles ocasions when spits would hoe me while i was in an il2 its your wirbles that have the problem they just have to hit it
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: IL2
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2008, 06:27:14 PM »
pwnz would be an understatement. It Rapes them.
few pings and p00f, you're dead. Its ridiculous

Yeah, i am sure the german tankers in ww2 said the same thing.

"HOW DARE OUR ENEMY INVENT A WEAPON SYSTEM THAT CAN KILL US, HOW DARE THEY!!"


 :huh
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: IL2
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2008, 06:47:08 PM »
The new il2 is WAY to powerful. It blowing tanks up with ease left and right.Gun only. :furious

il2 was powerful long time before the last patch, but was not used as much, and i still prefer the old 23mm because can do almost same damage vs GVs, just takes more shells, but it's way more efficient than 37mm vs air cons picking gv hunters.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: IL2
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2008, 06:51:36 PM »
I was dogfighting a N1K in an IL-2 over one of our VB's one night.  He finally got me but it took about 5-10 minutes.  The IL-2's not a bad turn fighter but a little help is nice.
And how many tanks did you kill while they were covered by that N1K2?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline KG45

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: IL2
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2008, 07:02:39 PM »
I've been getting good at giving IL2 the gun.

main gun.

face shooting an IL2 with the main gun is a gas.
all you fascists, you're bound to lose...

Offline weazely

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1943
Re: IL2
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2008, 07:13:11 PM »
2004 Subaru Impreza WRX.
Invidia V2 Catless Downpipe
STi Catback
HKS SQV BOV