Author Topic: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO  (Read 991 times)

Offline SgtPappy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« on: November 05, 2008, 10:46:48 PM »
In a book I read (Spitfire Late Marque Aces 1942-2945) stated that the No1 wing/RAAF was sent to Morotai in early 1945 as the 1st TAF. Apparently little gains were made, no fighters were encountered and Caldwell was getting angry due to the wasted potential of him and his men. The book was written with a bit of a bias by Alfred Price. He says that MacArthur simply didn't want any non-Americans to share in the glory.

I just wanted to see everyone's take on this, because such lack of combat does seem fishy. I know it couldn't have been the Spitifre's range because Spit8's on 90 ImpGallon DT's can fly from Morotai to Mindanao and back with a good amount of gas to spare, especially in 1945 when a lot of combat was taking place over the Philippines. The RAAF could have attacked the Japanese at Mindanao in early 1945, diverting some forces from Luzon where the Americans were attacking.
I am a Spitdweeb

"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth... Put out my hand and touched the face of God." -J.G. Magee Jr.

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3711
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2008, 11:30:32 PM »
MacArther not wanting to share the glory!  :O

That would not be entirely out of character for dugout Doug. :devil

444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline 68Wooley

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2008, 11:44:38 PM »
I'm sure the men serving under him would have been only too happy to share 'the glory'.

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2008, 11:50:01 PM »
For whatever reason, that period of history gave us numerous military leaders who upon reflection turned out to be egomaniacs.  MacArthur was one, but so was Patton and Montgomery.  Those are just the three on the Allied side that are easiest to bring to mind.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2008, 11:57:08 PM »
April 14, 1945 8 of the ranking RAAF officers including Caldwell who was a Group Captain at the time, offered their resignations all at once due to what they considered wasteful operations from Moratai.

It's covered in some detail in "The Air War Against Japan 1943-1945" by George Odgers, published as part of the official history of the Aussies at war by the Australian War Memorial.

One of my Spit XII hero's was an Aussie by the name of Barney Newman, seen below in his Spit XII of 41 Squadron with the squadron mascot "Perkin".  After his time with 41 he went back to the Pacific with 79 Squadron RAF flying Spit VIIIs.  He was killed on one of those 'wasteful' missions in August 45 when he went down strafing.  Some thought he hit a tree.  There were 3 Newman brothers who all served with the RAAF.  His older brother F.O. J.R. Newman was killed flying Beaufighters with 30 Squadron RAAF in September 43.  The youngest brother survived.  He was a gunner on RAAF Bostons.

It's not identified as Barney Newman's Spit VIII, but it's the one in the photo in Late Marque Spitfire Aces, page 81.  Note the 41 Squadron badge under the cockpit.


Almost forgot I had it in the photo collection.  Barney Newman and his 79 Squadron Spitfire VIII
« Last Edit: November 06, 2008, 12:10:08 AM by Guppy35 »
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9884
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2008, 02:42:52 AM »
I know the yanks hated having the RNZAF around cos we nicked their parts all the time, maybe the aussies were worse (not surprising given their ancestory).

Offline Sharrk

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2008, 03:05:11 AM »

Clive Caldwell and Bobby Gibbs weren't to happy with the situation at the time for the previously stated reasons, and did a bit of complaining about it as well.
The RAAF tried to shut them up by bringing up charges of using there spits to fly grog in for the boys. I think that 1 of the guys actualy had a bit of art work put on his spit with "Have a Grog" as the caption as a statement. I think they ended up with a repramand.

Some of the ground troops werent to happy either with risking there lives on isolated garrisons that were "withering on the grape vine", when they could have been used in a push north.
I new an old Digger that was with the first Aussie troops allowed into Japan after the surrender, he used to show me a sword he collected from a Japanese officer in New Guinea.
He used to say that Mac Arthur only wanted his boys in on the job, but I am sure that the Yank Troops would have been happy to share their foxholes with anybody willing to help.


Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2008, 03:43:57 AM »
This subject is an interesting one and this BBS isn't really a place where it is likely to illuminated successfully.

That said, there are two parts to your question that aren't necessarily linked inextricably. The Spitfire and the mutiny are separate matters. The first TAF mutiny had more factors than a simple reaction to the Supreme Commander's strategic views.

Politically there was a strong push in Washington by the Dutch to regain control over the NEI.  There was a similar concern about re-establishing control over North Borneo and Malaya by the British.  These pressures didn't carry much weight at the strategic sharp end, as Macarthur knew that his possession of the Philippines had effectively isolated all Japanese forces to his west.  They were a pure political concern. Okinawa was now taken and the fight was clearly headed to the home islands.

About the same time expressions of concern were raised about possible threats to the vast fuel supply chain needed to keep the gigantic war machine rolling to Japan.  The nearby East Indies and Borneo oil fields were still in Japanese hands and denied to the Allies even if they were no now use to Japan.  (Remember why this Pacific war started?)
It was decided to send Australian troops to recapture North Borneo.  Under agreements long in place, the RAAF were to provide the main air support to Australian operations.  The army goes, so does the RAAF.  In April 1944 North Borneo looked like a backwater (as distinct from today of course).

The oilfield concerns provided impetus to the political pressure about relieving the East Indies and Malaya.  There were moves to send Dutch troops to Australia for the NEI liberation operations.  London saw an opportunity to regain some territory and prestige in the area.  The Australians didn't like being taken out of the main thrust to Japan to be "wasted" in what they saw to be a backwater sideshow to shore up the British Empire.  This was also reflected at the highest level of Government.  They believed that they had earned the right to sit at the surrender table and weren't happy about the possibility of being cut out now the end game was nigh.

That is just the basic background.  There were many internal factors at play.  The RAAF was split into two arms, Operational and Administrative.  The operational commander, Bostock, had a greater affinity with Kenney of the 5th AF than the Admin people in Canberra.  In fact it was worse than this; he hated the Administrative boss Jones with a passion.  It was mutual.  This meant, at best, difficulties in the supply chain to the front. This animosity was no secret from the Officers at the sharp end.  There was a feeling that the support people at home were out of touch.  The RAAF were forced to draw supplies from US sources. (These were of superior quality which also didn't help morale when Australian supplies became available anyway).  At times squadron personnel were forced into unloading ships instead of servicing aircraft.  Replacement personnel weren't coming through and tours were being extended. People weren't enjoying the war much.

Group Captain Arthur had been making the case in TAF since the end of 44 that the way they were being used was wasteful.  He felt (and it was later borne out) that on some raids they suffered more damage than they inflicted. The local powers that be showed little concern or interest in his view.  The local AOC was Air Commodore Cobby a WW1 ace.  He was generally accepted as a reasonable person but there was little respect held for his staff.  Some further local animosity came out of a beer trading scandal.  Simply, the Australians were issued beer.  The Americans were issued money but no beer.  Some Australians liked money more than beer.  A number of Officers became involved in the trade and were dealt with strongly by Cobby's staff.  Noses out of joint.

Things were ripe for trouble.  Arthur convinced a number of senior Officers to submit their resignations.  The papers offered no reason for the resignations and no reasons were forthcoming at interview.  Bostock queried them without success.  General Kenney himself came down to talk sense and fairplay to them also without success.  Jones arrived from Australia, ordered an investigation and sacked Cobby and his two senior staff Officers.  It wasn't pretty.  Effectiveness of the force had to have been affected.

The investigation was reported in the official war record thusly:

"The fundamental cause seems to have been the conviction of a group of young leaders
that they were engaging in operations that were not militarily justifiable—
a conviction widely shared also by many Australian soldiers and Australian
political leaders . It is perhaps significant that several of them had served
with distinction in a critical period in the Middle East . After that the
operations of 1944 and 1945 were particularly frustrating . The subsequent
inquiry made it clear that almost everyone concerned acted from the
highest motives, and was convinced that, in the crisis, he acted wisely ."



I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2008, 04:39:10 AM »
The Spitfire problem is a little easier.

The greatest shortage as the Allied thrust travelled north west was in fact space.  When a new airfield became available it also quickly became crowded.  Kenney was very insistent that valuable space wasn't to be wasted.  An example of that was his banning of Vultee Vengeances.  He reasoned that instead of sending out 12 P40s as fighter cover to 12 Vengeances, he could simply send out 12 Kittyhawks with bombs instead.  This saved a huge amount of space on an airfield and also reduced stress on his supply chain.

Spitfires were another aircraft type to be supplied.  The supply train from Australia (ultimately the UK) was difficult and at times unreliable.  It took time to get them there and then bring them into action.  By April 45 there was in fact very little to air to air warfare in the area. The Japanese supply line had been finally cut off. 

Before this supply was almost non-existent due to the extraordinarily successful submarine warfare waged by the US Navy.  Nothing was safe from them.  Not even sampans in the surf!  Aircraft parts for even general maintenance weren't forthcoming.  A single attack by low level Beaufighters could be enough to completely take a Japanese field out of the equation.  They couldn't sustain offensive ops of any real threat after the Philippines fell.

Attack planes and bombers were of far more use to Kenney.  The Spitfires weren't outstanding in that role and their pilots viewed ground attacks as misuse. They probably didn't get high priority, but moving 452 from Darwin to Morotai still happened in late 44.  There was no need to bring any more certainly.  Sporadic nuisance night attacks by Japanese raiders were to be answered by the introduction of P61s.

The first TAF was able to provide Beaufighters, Mosquitos, B24s, Boomerangs and Wirraways and Kittyhawks to support Australian and Allied operations in the area as well as the Spits.  The Spits having no real enemy in the air to fight weren't generally able to be used in that role. 
79 Squadron had much the same fortunes at Goodenough Island when they took their Spit 5s there in 43.

The straight line distance from Morotai in the Halmaheras to Davao is about 350nm - mainly over water.  Spit 8's don't fly that distance, fight and then come home happily.  It's not just the Spits that weren't used though. Australian Air field construction units and sigint units went to the Philippines. Not much else. It was kept as a generally all-American show for practical and easily understood political reasons.  It's what happened after the Philippines that caused the greater upset. 


Here's a Google Map pic of the airfield today.

http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=2.0453381,128.32567&z=15&t=h&hl=en
I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9397
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2008, 08:39:18 AM »
"The fundamental cause seems to have been the conviction of a group of young leaders
that they were engaging in operations that were not militarily justifiable—
a conviction widely shared also by many Australian soldiers and Australian
political leaders . It is perhaps significant that several of them had served
with distinction in a critical period in the Middle East . After that the
operations of 1944 and 1945 were particularly frustrating . The subsequent
inquiry made it clear that almost everyone concerned acted from the
highest motives, and was convinced that, in the crisis, he acted wisely ."

Great account, Dantoo, thank you very much.

Boiled down to its essentials, the Brits committed the Australians to a meaningless but dangerous operation just so that they could be fighting somewhere.

Kind of like the Italian campaign.

- oldman

Offline SgtPappy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2008, 06:25:19 PM »
Really informative, gents! Guppy, I do not have that picture in my book... don't tell me we have different versions of the same book!

Thanks so much Dantoo. I was actually looking at that same airfield as I read your post. However, isn't it so that a Spitfire VIII equipped with a 90-gallon Imperial Drop Tank fly far enough to easily reach Mindanao? Or was the supply train limited with these DT's?

It is too bad, however, that no Beaufighters attacked Japanese positions in Mindanao...I understand that the primary role for the Spitfire was air-to-air combat and that smaller, more mobile obsolete fighters could do the jabo work, though the Spitfire would be the first choice in escorting Beaufighters to attack Japanese positions in Mindanao. Though it was more practical for the US Navy to attack the Philippines, it also makes much sense for the Allies to somehow band together to take the enemy ASAP. However, I do not fully make this claim since I don't understand the politics involved which stopped the Aussies from participating.

It would have been lovely if those chaps could put their crap aside and work hard to defeat the enemy. Perhaps then, less Filipinos, Americans and Australians would have died unnecessarily. Though 'unnecessarily' in itself is up to debate I suppose.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2008, 06:27:44 PM by SgtPappy »
I am a Spitdweeb

"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth... Put out my hand and touched the face of God." -J.G. Magee Jr.

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2008, 08:03:03 AM »
I've got no information on the availability of drop tanks.  I know there were air-ground strikes flown by the 3 Spitfire Squadrons in the Darwin Area out of Melville Island.  The distance from Pularumpi to Dili is not much shorter than we are talking about here so they had to have some additional fuel.

The fact is though it would need 90 gal drop tanks to make the round trip and we're only talking as far north as Davao.  With those aboard, perhaps they wouldn't be much use in the ground attack role, but they may have been able to do escort duties.  They did do some of that with the Beaufighters on other targets.  There were better aircraft available in the P38s and P47s for the long range escort.  Something of a parallel to the Europe experience.

So there were practical as well as political considerations.  These complemented each other. 
I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2008, 03:32:49 PM »
If I remember my history right Brit and Aussies Spitfire units had a troubled early history in the ATO and it caused some conflicts with the Americans. Basically their tactics used against the IJN were flawed and it took awhiles for them to change them. Even then the Spit was never the equal of Yank Jabos in range, versatility, and B&Z. The very things that destroyed the IJN.

I'm going from memory but didn't MacArthur himself question whether Spit equipped squadrons could even defend Australian air space, at some time in '42 or '43, after some debacle where a bunch of spits were shot down? Did all this "poisen the well" so to speak between the Allies early on?
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10616
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2008, 04:39:54 PM »
 Some info of that time & what happens when the boys have to much time on their hands.                                                                                                                                                                         Court Martial the Ace - Caldwell V the RAAF

 

"There is money to be made in liquor up at Morotai, so if you want to earn a few extra shillings you can sell liquor for me"
Caldwell to his batman, Darwin, late November 1944.

 

In late 1944 Caldwell moved his Spitfire Wing from Darwin to Morotai expecting to see at least some action against the enemy. Over the following months he became embroiled in a battle not so much with the enemy but the RAAF over allegations relating to illegal liquor trading on the 'black market'. This led to his arrest, Court Martial and a far reaching government enquiry into 1st TAF, RAAF.

Up at Morotai

On the 22nd of December, 1944, the first flight of Spitfires from No. 80 Wing led by its Commanding Officer Grp/Cpt Caldwell touched down at Morotai, a small coral island in the Halmaheras Group. The wing had left Darwin to be part of the RAAF's 1st TAF, a mobile strike force equipped with Bostons, Beaufighters, Kittyhawks and now Spitfires. Morotai had developed into a huge army and air force base populated with thousands of US and Australian servicemen. In preparation for the wings move, Caldwell had visited the island in November, 1944 with Squadron Leader Harpham to organise construction of a camp to house the wing's personnel.

The task seemed impossible to achieve as it soon became clear that the RAAF had neither the supplies nor equipment to enable a camp to be erected on the island to accommodate the wing. By contrast, the US Air force on the island was well equipped and had all the necessary machinery and equipment. Caldwell and his adjutant S/L Harpham approached the Americans for help. To obtain the Americans prompt assistance in supplying machinery and equipment and to foster goodwill, presents of liquor were made to a number of American officers. With the invaluable assistance and goodwill of the Americans, the camp was made reasonably habitable by the time the wing started to arrive on the island.

It was during this visit that Caldwell became alive to the possibility of selling liquor to servicemen on the island where demand for the product far exceeded its available supply. Liquor trading between Australian and US servicemen was a common activity in the South West Pacific and New Guinea. In contrast to other theatres of war where it was relatively easy to obtain liquor, recreation and entertainment at the nearest town or metropolitan centre, servicemen in the Pacific had limited avenues of escape from the monotony of camp life. The South West Pacific in WWII was nothing like a tropical paradise; it was an alien environment, sparsely populated with natives whose way of life had changed little since the stone-age. On his return to Darwin Caldwell remarked to his batman Corporal Parker, "There is money to be made in liquor up at Morotai, so if you want to earn a few extra shillings you can sell liquor for me". Parker was of a like mind and willingly took part in the venture. Later Caldwell claimed the remark was never made or at the very least it was misinterpreted by Parker, but subsequent events and investigations provided no support for this claim.

When Caldwell landed on the island with No.452 Squadron he had a bottle of whisky in the cockpit and nearly 5 dozen bottles of whisky, gin, beer and wine in an accompanying C.47 transport loaded with the squadrons equipment and supplies. It wasn't long before Parker came to Caldwell saying he knew of some Americans who wanted to buy some liquor. On Christmas day 1944, Corporal Parker, sold 2 to 4 bottles of whisky he had acquired from Caldwell to some American servicemen. From then on, Parker sold liquor on behalf of Caldwell 3 to 4 times a week in return for a commission or 'tip' of approximately 10% of the proceeds up until the 12th of January. On this day, Parker was out selling liquor for Caldwell when he met up with some American servicemen. While in the company of his new friends he got drunk and the money collected from the liquor sales he had made that day was either lost or stolen from him.

After this incident, LAC (Leading Aircraftsman) Charter, a steward attached to No. 80 wing HQ, started selling Caldwell's liquor. Charter together with LAC Fitzroy and Caldwell's batman Cpl. Parker would load the bottles into haversacks and go around to the various American camps to sell it.  Carrying haversacks filled with bottles was heavy work so Charter asked Caldwell if he could get a jeep for them. Caldwell got them a jeep and on the 1st of April  Charter, Fitzroy and Parker set off in their new transport to the American camps.  Carrying their haversacks, Charter and Fitzroy entered one of the American camps while Parker waited for them in the jeep. Upon entering one the tents they were apprehended by American MP's and taken into custody. After waiting a while Parker assumed they had found some buyers so he returned to No. 80 wing HQ unaware of the fate of his companions in the camp. The next day Parker told Caldwell that Charter and Fitzroy had not returned to camp and it seemed likely they had been caught by the MP's. He advised Caldwell that in the circumstances it would be wise to hide any liquor they had. Caldwell agreed, and Parker took the crates and bottles from Charter's and Caldwell's tent and hid it in a slit trench.

The MP's arrive

Caught red handed by the American MP's, Charter and Fitzroy knew there was little point in denying their actions. They were handed over to the RAAF Service Police where they made full and frank statements. The next day Flying Officer Schweppes, Deputy Assistant Provost Marshal, Service Police Unit, interviewed Caldwell and told him Charter and Fitzroy had made statements to the effect that they had sold liquor on his behalf. At first Caldwell denied he had any involvement in the sales but at a later interview he admitted the airman were indeed telling the truth and also added he had transacted some further sales himself.

In consequence of the investigations made by Schweppes, the AOC of 1st TAF, Air Commodore Cobby, suspended Caldwell from his appointment as CO of No. 80 Wing. On the 10th of April he was placed under open arrest and notified that charges were to be laid against him. The charges related to sales of liquor in breach of ABO 'N' 548 and these breaches constituted conduct to the prejudice of good order and air force discipline under Section 40 of the Air Force Act. Air Board Order 'N' 548 prohibited the importation and sale of alcoholic liquor into the Pacific Area by members of the RAAF. Strictly speaking the importation of a single bottle of liquor for personal consumption was a breach of the order but such an act was unlikely to attract or warrant a charge under Section 40.

A Field General Court Martial was convened on the 18th of April but due to the absence of defending counsel it did not commence until the 21st. Court Martial proceedings had already been taken against Wing Commander Gibbes based on Charters evidence of sales he made on his behalf. The charges were similar to those against Caldwell in that he sold liquor in contravention of ABO 'N' 548 and that in the particular circumstances outlined in the charge, this constituted conduct to the prejudice of good order and air force discipline. Gibbes simply pleaded guilty to all three charges even though he had yet to arrive at Morotai by the date specified in the first charge. He was sentenced to be reduced in rank to Flight Lieutenant but the AOC, 1st TAF varied the sentence to Squadron Leader. By the time Caldwells defence council arrived on the 21st of April, 1st TAF staff were too busy preparing for operations at Tarakan and Borneo to conduct the proceedings so it was decided to dissolve the court and release Caldwell from arrest. This however was not the end of the matter and Caldwell did appear before a Court Martial after the end of the war.

Caldwell's Allegations


Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10616
Re: Q: Australia and the US in the PTO
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2008, 04:45:05 PM »
Part II  On the 9th of April Caldwell sent a minute to the AOC 1st TAF Air Commodore Cobby giving him his version of events. In the minute he emphasis the exchange of alcohol with the Americans to obtain equipment and supplies for his Wing that were unobtainable from the RAAF. He also gives the impression that the idea of selling alcohol was Parker's and it was he who suggested to him, to sell liquor. Although Caldwell was trying to put himself in the role of a participant rather than principle in the liquor sales, as their commanding officer he readily accepted responsibility for the actions of Parker, Charter and Fitzroy and asked for leniency in their punishment.

In the minute to Cobby, Caldwell went on to say he was aware of liquor sales by officers senior to him in rank and appointment but that no action was ever taken against them. He contended that the 'N' order prohibiting the importation and trading of liquor in the Pacific was an order accepted by all as 'more honoured in the breach than the observance'. As far as Caldwell was concerned, it seemed unjust to taken disciplinary action against him in these circumstances and he asked Cobby to lend protection to him against what he described as 'discriminating punishment'. If this incident was to be used to make an example of him, he requested that Cobby terminate his commission in the RAAF.

Cobby replied to Caldwell's minute directing him to provide details of the alleged sales by senior officers and that as far as he could see there was no 'discriminating punishment' or desire to make an example of him. His request to terminate his commission was denied. With reluctance, Caldwell supplied details as he understood them of liquor sales by senior officers and the use of RAAF aircraft in its transportation. It was this communication that led the government to set up a 'Royal Commission of Enquiry' to investigate the matter.

Royal Commission

On the 11th of May 1945, the Minister of State for Air, Arthur Drakeford appointed John Barry KC (Kings Counsel) to investigate liquor trading in the RAAF with particular reference to the allegations made by Caldwell. In addition to liquor trading, the Commissioner was also directed to investigate why eight senior RAAF officers sought to resign their commissions at Morotai on the 20th of April 1945. These resignations were a separate and distinct issue with no connection to the liquor investigation. Due to the national security implications of the investigation, proceedings were heard in private and the report was not released to the public. The Commissioner wasted no time in gathering evidence and flew up to Morotai to gather statements with the assistance of two police detectives assigned to the commission. A major part of his investigation related to the allegations made by Caldwell in his minute to the AOC of 1st TAF,Air Commodore Cobby.

Caldwell alleged that the AOC's personal aircraft, a Lockheed Ventura was used early in April to transport a 'load of grog' from the mainland to Morotai. The Commissioner found the allegation was substantiated even though he found the term 'load of grog' was a little misleading as there were in fact only 3 cases of beer containing four dozen bottles each. One of the cases were for the medical personnel of the RAAF hospital and the remainder for a party Cobby planned to have for officers of 1st TAF before they embarked for operations on Tarakan. Clearly this importation was a breach of ABO 'N' 548 prohibiting the importation of liquor to the area but importantly the liquor was not used or imported for trading purposes.

Caldwell's allegation with respect to Air Vice Marshal Bladin were based on a conversation he over heard between Bladin and his adjutant S/L Lindeman during a poker game at Morotai. According to Caldwell, Lindeman had been out trying to trade liquor for American cigarettes on behalf of Bladin. At the time Caldwell made the allegation he was unaware of subsequent events involving Bladin's  Hudson at Essendon Airport. Bladin left Morotai in a Hudson and returned to Essendon Airport near Melbourne on the 23rd January 1945. Awaiting its arrival were Customs Officials who had received an anonymous tipoff that the aircraft was loaded with American cigarettes. The Customs Officers inspected the aircraft but found nothing. They then went across to Hut 11 where the Hudson crew were billeted. Hidden in the ceiling they found a considerable store of American cigarettes. The commissioner considered the cigarettes were brought to Essendon in Bladin's Hudson, most likely stored in the bomb bay. All those who had been in the Hudson however swore they had no knowledge of the cigarettes. The commissioner simply could not establish beyond reasonable doubt whether Bladin knew the cigarettes were on board the aircraft or whether he had been involved in any trade of liquor for cigarettes. Obviously somebody knew the cigarettes were there, but without an admission of guilt from their own lips the Commissioner was left with only suspicions and inference.

According to Caldwell, Air Commodore De La Rue while touring Dutch New Guinea in 1944 exchanged a bottle of whisky for an American Carbine (rifle). The Commissioner found that although Caldwell honestly believed this event had occurred based on what others had told him, investigations by the commissioner could find no evidence to substantiate the allegation.

Caldwell went on to described how Kittyhawks based at Noemfoor had been used to import liquor. On the 26th of September, the wing leader of No. 78 Wing, W/C L Jackson, together with 4 other kittyhawks took off from Noemfoor for a strike on the Tenimber Islands. They bombed and strafed installations at Saumlak after which the Kittyhawks flew on to Darwin where arrangements had been made to pick up liquor supplies before proceeding back to Noemfoor. With their bottles of liquor loaded in the wing ammo bays and cockpit the Kittyhawks left Darwin on the 30th and returned to Noemfoor. Not surprisingly, they made no attacks on the return journey! At Noemfoor the liquor was distributed amongst the RAAF units and Command house of No.10 Operational Group. Another flight was made on the 4th of October . This time they bombed and strafed installations on Kei Island which is adjacent to Tenimber Island. At Darwin liquor supplies were obtained and Jackson, who had finished his operational tour, remained at Darwin to proceed south to a new posting.