Author Topic: Three vehicles ?  (Read 2161 times)

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2008, 08:56:48 AM »
I'm seeing a lot of personal "wants" and not many AH2 "needs".  The current gv game has a lot of gaps.  It does not have a legit tank destroyer and it does not have a legit direct fire support vehicle. 

I'd say a TD such as the M10, M18, or the non-turreted Jagdpanzer (much would depend on the amount of swivel the gun has and how good the optics are) is needed prior to adding in any more tanks.  I'll vouch for the M18.

Also, an M3 halftrack with the 75mm cannon or the Sdkfz 251/9 with the 7.5cm cannon for HE support (both would be very much like the LVT4 but much faster) would fit the bill nicely.  The 251 is a bit more stout than the M3, so it would fair batter vs enemy fire.  The Priest or Saxon with the 105mm cannon would be good too.  I'll vouch for the 251/9.

Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2008, 09:11:15 AM »
Artillery for indirect fire, spotted by jeeps and such. Anti tank guns, towed by SDK or something.  More gameplay variety instead of more flavors of the same gameplay.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2008, 09:19:28 AM »
Artillery for indirect fire, spotted by jeeps and such. Anti tank guns, towed by SDK or something.  More gameplay variety instead of more flavors of the same gameplay.

Try out the current 251 w/ the 45d firing angle.  Have your buddy in a jeep up and over the ridge adjust fire for you and tell us how quickly you abandon you quest to zero in your indirect fire.  ;)  Unless HTC implemted some a system like the 8in and 5in bnaval guns, a lot of time would be lost.  :)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #18 on: November 29, 2008, 03:01:50 PM »
I don't understand the problem. The 251 doesnt have enough ammo and the jeep at the moment doesnt have binocs, so its not really comparable as I see it. The M8 does great at ranging for the 251, Ive done it. Giving ground arty the same sort of point-click automation as navy guns have now would be way too easy.

Towed anti tank guns would be great to ambush ground offensives with. Towed AAA 88s too for that matter..
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #19 on: November 29, 2008, 03:24:01 PM »


Churchill Crocodile, fast, efficient, flamethrower's and all...

Lt. Pope

Flamethrower, gives a whole new meaning to i have the map room covered, roast them as they enter LOL

 :lol
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #20 on: November 29, 2008, 03:24:45 PM »
Flamethrower, gives a whole new meaning to i have the map room covered, roast them as they enter LOL

 :lol
:rofl
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #21 on: November 29, 2008, 04:17:43 PM »
Difference between Sherman and Sherman Firefly Den.
The I guess you could say "normal" sherman had a 75mm gun, the firefly has an 85mm?? (I think, not too sure)
The Firefly wasn't mass produced like the normal Sherman because the Americans didn't want to put a British-made gun on their tanks
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2008, 12:16:14 AM »
The Sherman Firefly had the OQF 17 pdr. (76 mm) high velocity main gun.

The British 17 pdr (tough also 76 mm) had a higher muzzle velocity than the US made 3 inch (also 76 mm) guns and could penetrate more armor. They were completely above the earlier short 75 mm guns used on most Sherman's.

 :salute
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12797
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #23 on: November 30, 2008, 11:04:05 PM »
Matilda II

any stug variant

IS-2 as a perked tank destroyer or a T-80 soviet light tank
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2008, 04:54:19 AM »
M1A2 AbR4m$!
L3pord 2!!!!!!
K1nG t1Gr!!!


L1k3 w3 tOtaLE N33d thE$3 CUZ Ther3 Kewl!!!11!!11!



OK, enough with the fun L337


I'd actually like to see the..

M4A3
Any British Tank
Panzer III (or any early war german tank)

Maybe perked...
Sturmtiger (yes it saw combat! 18 were built  :D :O )
IS2
Panther

Offline Selino631

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2008, 01:21:17 PM »
Italian P40 Tank,

OEF 11-12

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2008, 01:42:12 PM »
The M3 with the 75mm howitzer to start. Wespe perhaps... something along those lines.

This will prolly be my last tour in AH but artillery of some sort outside the cruiser would be nice  :)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2008, 06:54:13 PM »
Planes
Ki-27
Ki-21 "Sally"
I-16 (with Soviet and Nationalist Chinese skins)

Ground Vehicles (Sorry for going past the 3 wish limit)
Char B1
Matilda
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III Ausf.F
Panzer III Ausf.G
Panzer 38(t)
Panzer 35(t)

Any of the above planes and ground vehicles would be a great addition to the Early War set up.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline 19kilo10(ironnite)

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #28 on: December 06, 2008, 03:05:00 PM »
SOMUA S-35, Type 97 CHI-HA, Matilda 2

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Three vehicles ?
« Reply #29 on: December 06, 2008, 03:08:41 PM »
CHAR
Brummbar for town killing (but enlarge the towns 25%).
Matilda


Adding the "Standard" M4 is pointless.   

-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC