Author Topic: PANTHER--> please  (Read 2857 times)

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
PANTHER--> please
« on: December 04, 2008, 07:34:34 PM »
with over 6,500 built, I think it deserves a place here!  :rock

Offline opposum

  • Probation
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2008, 09:11:11 PM »
i agree  :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray :pray


/_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2008, 11:06:56 PM »
YOU MEAN THIS SEXY THANG!!!?



 :O


Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2008, 01:18:51 PM »
with over 6,500 built, I think it deserves a place here!  :rock

 It actually could fit in with the current tanks we have very nice. Tiger, Firefly, T34/85 and another Panther could kill. So it wouldn't be super uber.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2008, 01:21:59 PM »
Two thumbs up! :aok :aok
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline chris3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
      • http://www.ludwigs-hobby-seite.de/
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2008, 05:53:25 PM »
im for it too  :aok :aok

cu chris3

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2008, 07:01:00 PM »
I dont have the stats in front of me, but the Panther would be a faster, more menouverable, and quicker firing than the Tiger in AH2

The Panther's 75mm gun would be at worst the same as the AH2 17lb'er in the M4 Firefly, the armor would behave very similar if not a tad bit better than the AH2 Tiger's (providing it is modeled properly), and its speed would rival the T34 (30mph v 35mph).  Certain things cant be modeled by HTC that figured into the real world battlefield experience of the Pzr V, such as the less than steller transmission, etc. 

If it were to be introduced into the AH2 realm, I suspect it would be perked the same as the Tiger is not even more.

However, I suspect the Pzr V is not the front-runner to be added.   ;)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2008, 07:02:36 PM »
I'm all in for the Panther. :pray
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2008, 07:11:28 PM »
I think we should get more Medium and light tanks before we get another heavy. It should be added eventually though (even though it was riddled with engine problems)  :O
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline VansCrew1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2377
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2008, 07:29:11 PM »
 :aok :aok
Tour 79
Callsign: VansCrew


"The Ringer"

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2008, 07:37:00 PM »
seconded
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2008, 08:42:36 PM »
Yeah. It wouldnt be uber considering the other tanks we have. I think the Panther is probably the "most needed" new GV for the game.

Want to beat it? Get to a side shot or to the rear. Am I right that frontal wise it was the hardest kill for WW-ll tanks? How do the other tanks rate, compared to it, with frontal shots?
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2008, 08:51:32 PM »
I know regarding the Panther, the A and D models had a good shot-trap beneath the mantlet that was used to ricochet AP shells down into the thin roof, where the shell would kill the driver and bow gunner.

Even the picture posted in this thread points it out.   MANY Panthers were knocked out in WWII from the Front, using this "passed along" bit of "Intel". 

-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline FLOTSOM

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2822
      • http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2008, 09:23:27 PM »
FLOTSOM

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!
Quote from Skuzzy
"The game is designed to encourage combat, not hide from it."
http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: PANTHER--> please
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2008, 09:27:24 PM »
I've got to say, we BY FAR need a standard gunned M-4 more than we need another uber-tank right now. As the last FSO showed. Firefly is too much for Panzer, but the M-8 is not an ideal stand-in for facing Panzers, and having to use stand-ins sucks anyway.

And we had the anachronism of having to use Fireflies in Tunisia, because that is the only Sherman we have, and then having to give the Axis buckets of Tigers, just to bring the field level with the Fireflies...its a mess I tell ya.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."