« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Submarine crash  (Read 923 times)

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Submarine crash
« on: February 16, 2009, 08:03:47 AM »
Logged
I am a spy!

Offline Shamus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3582
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2009, 08:44:08 AM »
They should have had lookouts watching out the window.

shamus
Logged
one of the cats

FSO Jagdgeschwader 11

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2009, 11:34:09 AM »
I'm only amazed the british submarine didn't sink. It must have been just a graze on the paint.
Logged

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 11:36:53 AM »
must have been drunk.
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Curlew

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1280
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2009, 12:35:29 PM »
 :rofl :aok
Atta boy chaps!
Logged
It is I, Ens. Pulver! And I have just thrown your palm tree overboard!
Quote from: Helm
The best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Callsign---Curlew

Offline crazyivan

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3920
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2009, 12:36:46 PM »
Who was following who? And who put the brakes on ? :rolleyes:
Logged
POTW
"Atleast I have chicken!"- Leroy Jenkins

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2009, 12:41:42 PM »
Did anyone surrender?  :D
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2009, 12:45:30 PM »
What are the odds yathink?

Sounds to me like they were playing cutsie with each other. In case your wondering the Frenchie SSBM can take out about 96 targets, each warhead blowing at about 150 kt, "Hiroshima was 16 kt". And the Bloody Brit boat is loaded with 16 Yank Trident D-5s, each one capable of delivering up to 12 MIRV'ed warheads that blow at 450 kt. Thats 192 city busters!

Good Lord find a different bloody boat to play arse grab with.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2009, 01:19:31 PM by Rich46yo »
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Fulmar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3936
      • Aces High Movie Database
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2009, 12:47:05 PM »
Surprised when I heard it was a French and UK sub.  I figured an old Chinese sub would have be involved.  Ya know, probably in the left turn lane with its right blinker on for the last 5 miles going about 10 knots under the posted speed limit.

/I'm here all week
//try the fish
Logged
In game callsign: not currently flying
Flying off and on since Warbirds
Aces High Movies available at www.derstuhl.net/ahmd2 - no longer aceshighmovies.com - not updated either

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2009, 12:54:49 PM »
and yet despite this i still want to join the navy. :D

Trident FTW :aok
Logged
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2009, 01:06:43 PM »
Didn't read the article, but you would think with all that top-notch radar this could have easily been avoided
Logged
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2009, 01:19:10 PM »
Quote from: B4Buster on February 16, 2009, 01:06:43 PM
Didn't read the article, but you would think with all that top-notch radar this could have easily been avoided

Submarines, most of all SSBMs, hate to use sonar for anything. Im not a navy guy but I know they like to become black holes in the ocean. Our Ohio class boats are so quiet even we cant find them.

We had a fair share of collisons playing arse grab with the commies but we would pick them up outside their ports and stay with them. Two SSNs I could understand because they are like the fighter jocks under the waves. But two SSBMs? I dont think its ever happened before.
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Gman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3731
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2009, 01:22:33 PM »
Quote
Submarines, most of all SLBMs, hate to use sonar for anything

Active sonar, yes.  Passive sonar is an SSN/SSBN 's bread and butter.
Logged

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2009, 01:30:27 PM »
Quote from: Gman on February 16, 2009, 01:22:33 PM
Active sonar, yes.  Passive sonar is an SSN/SSBN 's bread and butter.

Sonar is sonar. You send radio waves thru the ocean like you do radar. I dont think you would call "passive detection" "sonar". Anyway its all called a "combat system" in the end, using both active and passive sensors. Which is why I think both boats, both very capable boats, were playing grab arse with each other and crashed. I cant see either not knowing the other was out there when so close.

But...I'm not a navy guy. Maybe those who were/are could clarify.
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Phaser11

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 863
Re: Submarine crash
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2009, 01:32:38 PM »
"CON Sonar", "CRAZY IVAN!!!!"
Logged
Phaser11,

"Long time we no get drunk together nathen"
"Silence! I kill you"
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »