Author Topic: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14  (Read 13490 times)

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2009, 08:38:41 PM »
Damage list says: 1 radiator. If that's hit, its gone. ;)

Image from WarbirdDech Series Merlin-Powered Spitfires
« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 08:40:28 PM by MachFly »
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2009, 08:39:57 PM »
Image from WarbirdDech Series Merlin-Powered Spitfires
(Image removed from quote.)

I'm NOT talking about real life. I do know there are two. Thank you.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2009, 08:42:58 PM »
Uhhmmm wait... if I think about it... I can't remember having had any radiator loss in a Spit XIV... :noid

same
been flying the spitfire for about a year now

HTC probably made the radiator indestructible because it was much easier than modifying the game just for 1 aircraft. 
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2009, 10:08:52 PM »
The rad's not indestructible and the 4 hog is easily the more rugged of the two planes.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2009, 10:30:23 PM »
The rad's not indestructible and the 4 hog is easily the more rugged of the two planes.

I'm not sure if i agree with that. Spitfires' tale section can take much more fire, and again the F4U has only 1 fuel tank.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2009, 11:28:02 PM »
paper wings on the spit...hell I even broke a couple of pairs on a flat turn.
now posting as SirNuke

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2009, 11:31:05 PM »
were you going 500mph and pulled the stick as far as it goes?

spitfires' wings create much more lift than most other planes. Also you know how you usually compress planes when you go to fast, spitfire will want to pull up instead.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2009, 11:51:44 PM »
Uh oh, don't get schlowy started on the 109's dual radiators...

But it would be cool if the K-4 had its shut-off switch in case one of them is hit. ;)
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2009, 11:57:49 PM »
I took a 37mm round at about 1.2k from a Yak-9T and lost the radiator on a Spitfire Mk XIV.  It can be hit.

Uh oh, don't get schlowy started on the 109's dual radiators...

But it would be cool if the K-4 had its shut-off switch in case one of them is hit. ;)
Dual radiator Spits had an automatic shutoff valve as well.  In AH those would be the Mk VIII, Mk IX, Mk XIV and Mk XVI.  Couldn't run at full power, but it would get you home.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2009, 12:01:00 AM »
Also alot of you guys said that F4U-4 is much better that spit 14 hands down. Did you guys take into account that -4 has only 1 internal fuel tank, which means there is 1 spot on that aircraft that you can hit the take it out of commission. (which is why I don't fly planes with a single radiator) 

What makes you think that you'll ever get an opportunity to shoot?  ;)


My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2009, 12:46:36 AM »
I'm not sure if i agree with that. Spitfires' tale section can take much more fire, and again the F4U has only 1 fuel tank.
I'm not going to argue it.. It's really obvious IMO.  The hogs take enough punishment to put them in the top ranks in that respect, whereas the spit is pretty middling.  Their wings are real fragile, dud 30mm's notwithstanding.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2009, 01:02:51 AM »
I don't want to turn this into an arguing poll, just want to know your opinions.

The radiator and the fuel tank thing that i said was just to keep in mined.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2009, 01:05:37 AM by MachFly »
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2009, 01:50:45 AM »
were you going 500mph and pulled the stick as far as it goes?

Not even close thats the thing, level flight near max speed, roll right, then pull the stick hard enough, but not enough to blackout totally. I think its hard to reproduce, it happens on spit14 and even spit9 sometimes.
now posting as SirNuke

Offline SectorNine50

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1331
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2009, 02:44:18 AM »
Spits are one of the easiest aircraft to take down once you get a shot.  F4U's will take all sorts of 50 cals before they lose anything important.
I'm Sector95 in-game! :-D

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: F4U-4 vs Spitfire 14
« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2009, 04:27:20 AM »
Dual radiator Spits had an automatic shutoff valve as well.  In AH those would be the Mk VIII, Mk IX, Mk XIV and Mk XVI.  Couldn't run at full power, but it would get you home.

would like to see this implemented :aok
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli