« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: A look @ the Ho-103 the US 50cal and 2 others  (Read 2219 times)

Offline Spritle

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
A look @ the Ho-103 the US 50cal and 2 others
« Reply #30 on: January 16, 2001, 01:17:00 PM »
Tony,

I think you meant to say well armed bombers.  As I understand it bombers carried very little armour, but they did have lots of guns.

As a rule of thumb only things that carry liquids need armour i.e. radiators, heat exchangers, people....

Spritle
Logged

Offline Tony Williams

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
      • http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk
A look @ the Ho-103 the US 50cal and 2 others
« Reply #31 on: January 16, 2001, 02:57:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Spritle:
Tony,

I think you meant to say well armed bombers.  As I understand it bombers carried very little armour, but they did have lots of guns.

As a rule of thumb only things that carry liquids need armour i.e. radiators, heat exchangers, people....

Spritle

Perhaps I should have said "very tough bombers".  The B-17 could take an appalling amount of damage and still keep flying.

Tony Williams
Author: "Rapid Fire: The development of automatic cannon, heavy machine guns and their ammunition for armies, navies and air forces"
Details on my military gun and ammunition website: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~autogun/index.htm  


Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »