I touched a nerve?
Why do you not correct Wiki by the way?
Did you read the quotations?
What the problem was : "The main reason was that the units could not be manufactured using hollow spur gears, due to the shortage of suitable gear-cutting machinery in Germany during the war"
It's not the skill, it's not the design, it's the war. It's tool shortage.
The suspension also was a teaser in the beginning. It's called a teething problem, and is nothing that "ever so perfection-minded Germans" are immune to. The goal was speed and a smooth ride, and the Panther surely lived up to it's name in that department.
Doctrine? Field workshop vs crew repair. Make your choice, it's even debated today. The Leopard is rather like the Panther, and it's about as fine as it gets. Doesn't change the fact that the Panther had a bumpy beginning due to teething problems, which were cured as well as possible depending on the circumstances.
As for the weak point (Charge) its just side armour basically.
And the 109? AFAIK 5% lost in landing accidents, which is somewhat normal for the types and time. Never heard a claim with your figure DieHard. For a teaser though, Werner Mölders once quoted that the British fighters (Spitfire and Hurricane) were ridiculously easy to land. That is something for another thread.
Back to AH and tank wishes. IMHO the normal Shermy will be requested until it's there, nd it's a very little job, so why not. Maybe the freaky variants could then be added later.
The Panther is a must. Would be perked. Would shine in AH.
The JS, oh man, mean.
The Cromwell. Since the Comet was downgeared to fix the track problems, which would not be modelled anyway, the Cromwell would then have a place in AH. Later models had the same gun as the Comet anyway. Slightly less armoured than a Comet, with almost the firepower of a Firefly and 40 mph, what do you think?