Author Topic: new score ideas  (Read 1851 times)

Offline stroker71

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 939
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #30 on: May 03, 2009, 01:15:41 AM »
While this is on the right track, one could simply up 30 times really quick and end flight right away.  It should alos have a time constraint... say... 15 hours... 20 hours.... whatever.

I agree I just got 2nd in attack in MidWar with 8 sorties...kinda sad if you ask me.

<S> DuHasst
Back to DuHasst
Here since tour 84
Quote by Uptown "It's one thing to play the game...quite another to live there."

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7001
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #31 on: May 03, 2009, 02:01:13 AM »
OP

1.   How about just make strat targets only worth a certain fraction of a real base structure like a hangar?  For example... town building = 1/4 a hangar, city house = 1/10 a hangar, etc.  So when you drop a stuka nuke on a city and blow up 20 houses your hit % is really only 2%, not 20% or whatever.

2.  Not sure this is within the confines of the scoring format.  How would this adjust for hit %?  I feel like everyone generally gets an even look at bombers each tour and there definitely is a risk factor going after them.  Imo, only a big deal if someone is shade vulching them.

3.  Similar idea, more efficient, more complicated.   :devil

Minimum Missions Flown Formula would be as follows: You take your total individual ranks added up and divide it by variable Fm (Min Mission Factor) Fm will level off as your mission # goes up.
Fm will be a number that approaches 1 as your missions increase.  For example if you have only 10 missions flown, your Fm # will be like 0.5, If you have 30 missions flown your Fm # will be like 0.8 if you have 300 missions flown, your Fm will be 0.9987 or something.
The Fm curve would have to be opinionated at what HTC would deem "reasonable number of missions for a tour" For example, 1 Mission a day would get you 30 missions, which would probably be good enough for like a 0.8 Fm or something.  This would be a good way to still give rank to players with only a few missions flown but penalize them as far as overall ranks go for not flying a reasonable amount to be considered for top ranks.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #32 on: May 03, 2009, 11:08:45 AM »
I think the system HTC is using is already better than that because the city can usually get hit once in three or four hours because it dont rebuild fast like the other strats do and you get the same points by killing carriers. Pushing the favor to 'frequent fliers' is like hitech says changing things to favor one flying style but in this case its already taken care of with the points scored.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #33 on: May 03, 2009, 07:18:53 PM »
I have never dropped a 4k bomb so you are completely clueless and yes this entire thread is merely a plea for attention and a whine about improving score/rank to reflect how you play.  :rolleyes:





 lol i know how to lower rank when we got paid here to get low rank never out of top 10 once.  tested alot of maps for hitech i know exactly where how to get most hit % . so does shawk and others who go for rank. its not rocket sience.there is no way to fly high to 1 strat bomb it completly dead and get 1500% hit .Only 1 way to get 1500 to 2200 like shawk gets its drop the MOAB's only. but hey we can bet on this chellenge if u like. do 1 sortie first day of tod i'll fly cover u killl strat dropping 1000's kill entire strat land then we check scores. bet any thing you like. you game will film show to tjis post.

Offline Chilli

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4278
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #34 on: May 03, 2009, 07:47:08 PM »
 :aok Scoring and ENY have me at a loss for words.  Change them........ clearly ENY has eliminated a few ponies, tempests, and La7s, but plenty of low perk planes that make this addition pretty much moot.  Scores should reflect a pilots ability not his preference in plane and target selection.....

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #35 on: May 04, 2009, 11:46:40 AM »
lol i know how to lower rank when we got paid here to get low rank never out of top 10 once.  tested alot of maps for hitech i know exactly where how to get most hit % . so does shawk and others who go for rank. its not rocket sience.there is no way to fly high to 1 strat bomb it completly dead and get 1500% hit .Only 1 way to get 1500 to 2200 like shawk gets its drop the MOAB's only. but hey we can bet on this chellenge if u like. do 1 sortie first day of tod i'll fly cover u killl strat dropping 1000's kill entire strat land then we check scores. bet any thing you like. you game will film show to tjis post.

It does not matter what you have done you dont have a clue especially if you think I said bomb the strat completely and I never said anything about the 'MOABs' which wont help and by the way 2200 is a low bombing percentage.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #36 on: May 04, 2009, 12:48:57 PM »
You must be new.  Only top 100 pilots bomb strats dude. 


( this increases fights for fighter jocks and makes those wanting low rank to stop going to undefended  strats, )
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2009, 05:54:36 PM »
It does not matter what you have done you dont have a clue especially if you think I said bomb the strat completely and I never said anything about the 'MOABs' which wont help and by the way 2200 is a low bombing percentage.



lol and you think i have no clue. saying 2200% is low percentage. like i said u need to becareful people see thru ur trys of hiding ur game play lol

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #38 on: May 05, 2009, 08:34:44 PM »
The way the game has been since I started you can run bomber percentage to any number you choose even 1000000%. So yes you have no clue about bombing percentage.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #39 on: May 05, 2009, 09:00:32 PM »
ssdd
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #40 on: May 06, 2009, 11:10:28 AM »
The way the game has been since I started you can run bomber percentage to any number you choose even 1000000%. So yes you have no clue about bombing percentage.


lol  your so wrong bomb hit % can't get too 1 million./ lol you r so weak its too funny, lolololollolololololololololo loloololollololoolololloollol olololoolollool

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: new score ideas
« Reply #41 on: May 10, 2009, 10:15:57 PM »
Yes it can and I emailed HTC about it and they are going to fix it but as it stands right now I could make my bomber percentage anything I want and I do mean anything.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.