Author Topic: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD  (Read 7522 times)

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #105 on: June 02, 2009, 01:18:25 PM »
You want us to fix a test app?

Sudz,

I would rather have the bug fixed before the release of the long awaited patch. The phenomenon also occurs in our current client.

Now if your asking me what I want... :t

Keep up the great work HTC. :aok



:rofl

 :P
« Last Edit: June 02, 2009, 02:13:43 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #106 on: June 02, 2009, 02:03:46 PM »
The pheromone also occurs in our current client.
lolwut

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #107 on: June 02, 2009, 02:12:50 PM »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #108 on: June 02, 2009, 02:16:01 PM »
:D
That was funny though :lol

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #109 on: June 03, 2009, 04:02:12 PM »
Ok, there is a new gtester available.  You can download it here.

http://downloads.hitechcreations.com/gtester3.zip

This should fix the water.  If you were running gtester before and seeing the normal (not low detail) terrain but not seeing the water, we'd like to make sure that you can now see the water.  Please report any other anomalies that you see in this version.  Thanks.

<EDIT>  It appears that full screen mode is not working in this version, so we'll just need you to do your testing in a window.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2009, 04:19:25 PM by Pyro »

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #110 on: June 03, 2009, 04:14:38 PM »
Pyro, are you sure you have enough sub folders in the latest download?



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #111 on: June 03, 2009, 04:18:28 PM »
Kazaa, there should only be one subfolder.  There are some other subfolders that get created after you run it.


Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #112 on: June 03, 2009, 04:21:50 PM »
cc. :huh
« Last Edit: June 03, 2009, 04:47:46 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #113 on: June 03, 2009, 04:37:47 PM »
Woah, those are some major changes.

Pyro,

Any reason why the textures look so different?

I feel HTC was going in the right direction with gtester1, it looked nicely detailed, maybe just a bit to much farm land. The colours were also much richer, gtester3 seems to be the complete opposite.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2009, 05:06:36 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #114 on: June 03, 2009, 06:48:40 PM »
Pyro,
The Gtester3 folder is under Documents and Settings\Pyro\Desktop in the new .zip.

Woah, those are some major changes.

Pyro,

Any reason why the textures look so different?

I feel HTC was going in the right direction with gtester1, it looked nicely detailed, maybe just a bit to much farm land. The colours were also much richer, gtester3 seems to be the complete opposite.
I like them, especially the new 'bump' pattern. It's a bit darker all around but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #115 on: June 03, 2009, 07:12:28 PM »


First, my DxDiag.txt is here






Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #116 on: June 03, 2009, 07:15:39 PM »
gtester3 (running in windowed mode)

Frame Rate- 31.4
Res- 1379x1009

I noticed the same reflection stretching as in the earlier version, see below.

HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #117 on: June 03, 2009, 08:05:29 PM »
Only thing about the updated version is that the oceans look like dirty toilet water.

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #118 on: June 04, 2009, 03:59:21 AM »
Only thing about the updated version is that the oceans look like dirty toilet water.

+1.



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Graphics compatibility test - DISCUSSION THREAD
« Reply #119 on: June 04, 2009, 06:15:12 AM »
Crossfire HD2600XT.

despite the full screen crash, the water is showing in gtester3 and looks very good.

the evening lightning is nice, but the sun is showing thru the hills.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2009, 06:18:08 AM by Noir »
now posting as SirNuke