Exactly Nefarious,
Built in production, units fully trained, deployed but no combat. Like the F8F or P-51H.
IMHO this qualifies as more of a WW2 fighter than a proto-type that was being test flown when bounced by enemy fighters or an A/C in which more were destroyed by straffing than actually flew in combat missions.
I think having reached at least 1 full production run during WW2(the end of WW2, not when Germany punked out) qualifies as a WW2 fighter.
When you consider that WW2 started in 1939 with Germany invading Poland(Spanish civil war also) and continued through 1945. This gives Germany 6 years of combat fighter production and developement. Compare that to the US which entered the war in Dec. 1941 or really in 1942. That gave the US only 3 years of fighter developement. Then you have people on these boards who say that 1945 planes are perks or not WW2 fighters, so that makes 2 years of US A/C that have some rediculous set of requirements to meet before they are considered to qualify as a WW2 fighter and even then people complain about the F4U-1C which fits every possible criteria for being in the plane set.
Here are a few US fighters that were flying in 1944 after 2 years of fighter developement and reached some level of production.
P-47M
P-47N
F4U-3
F2G
F4U-4
F8F-1
P-51H
If these A/C are not WW2 fighters then why should any country be allowed more than 2 years of fighter production to qualify for either a WW2 fighter or a non-perk A/C.
So thats fair right? No US planes after 1944 and no German planes after 1941 or they are all perked right
![](http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)