I find the idea that the 109 could only run "balls to the wall" for two minutes EXTREMELY fishy, since this directly contradicts operating instructions, and what I know about other WWII powerplants, which seem to have survived running balls-to-the-wall for extended periods quite successfully when nessecary.
When the 190A was introduced to the Western front, the SpitV was standard. Far slower, out-accelerated, out-climbed, badly-outrolled and out-dived by the 190. Its better turn would be of no consequence if the 190 pilots used the right tactics. Of course the 190 was a nightmare when first introduced in the West.
The 190As began appearing in the East somewhat later, and were often used in a fighter-bomber role that made them more vulnerable, and the Russians quickly developed planes that could come close to, match, and finally exceed the Antons in performance, while far exceeding them in maneuver-a turning disadvantage DOES count if your opponent DOES stand a reasonable chance of being able to force you to engage. This accounts for the differing attitudes regarding the 190, East and West.