Author Topic: F7F Tigercat!!  (Read 1780 times)

Offline jolly22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1587
F7F Tigercat!!
« on: January 23, 2010, 08:59:37 AM »


Role Fighter aircraft
Manufacturer Grumman
First flight 2 November 1943
Introduced 1944
Retired 1954
Primary users United States Navy
United States Marine Corps
Produced 1943–1946
Number built 364
General characteristicsCrew: 2 (pilot, radar operator)
Length: 45 ft 4 in (13.8 m)
Wingspan: 51 ft 6 in (15.7 m)
Height: 16 ft 7 in (5.1 m)
Wing area: 455 ft² (42.3 m²)
Empty weight: 16,270 lb (7,380 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 25,720 lb (11,670 kg)
Powerplant: 2× Pratt & Whitney R-2800-34W "Double Wasp" radial engines, 2,100 hp (1,566 kW) each
PerformanceMaximum speed: 460 mph (400 knots, 740 km/h)
Range: 1,200 mi (1,000 nmi, 1,900 km)
Service ceiling: 40,400 ft (12,300 m)
Rate of climb: 4,530 ft/min (1,381 m/min)
ArmamentGuns:
4 × 20 mm (0.79 in) M2 cannon
4 × 0.50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine gun
Bombs:
2 × 1,000 lb (454 kg) bombs under wings or
1 × torpedo under fuselage


American version of the mossie or 110...Can be a great CV killer.

3./JG 53 cheerleader - Battle Over The Winter Line - FLY AXIS - JRjolly

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2010, 09:38:37 AM »
Didn't see combat in WWII.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline jolly22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1587
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2010, 09:42:54 AM »
cc didnt read that......delete please

3./JG 53 cheerleader - Battle Over The Winter Line - FLY AXIS - JRjolly

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2010, 01:20:17 PM »
Didn't see combat in WWII.

often wondered why it was deployed on mission and it was patrolling just didnt engage
how much combat did the 152`s see
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2010, 01:41:11 PM »
often wondered why it was deployed on mission and it was patrolling just didnt engage
how much combat did the 152`s see


More than the Tigercat ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2010, 01:58:58 PM »
-1 if you think it will be added in the next two years.

+1 after 2 years.

We NEED to add the 111, G4M, Ki 43, Yak 3, Beaufighter

I WANT Spit XII, Pe 2, Me 109g-10, Westland Whirlwind, Hurricane mk IIb, A-26, Fairey Swordfish and the 38H.



Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2010, 02:16:54 PM »
More than the Tigercat ;)

the only reason the 152 saw combat was because the enemy was flying over their
airfields,  and not traveling 4k miles to front lines.

If  a plane was in PRODUCTION and in Squadron service during WW2, it should be in
AH eventually. Which both F7F and F8F meet.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2010, 02:21:26 PM »
If  a plane was in PRODUCTION and in Squadron service during WW2, it should be in
AH eventually. Which both F7F and F8F meet.
There are other criteria, hence the arguments about combat usage...which neither the F7F nor F8F as well as other planes meet...but hey, it's ok to wish.




jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2010, 02:21:45 PM »
the only reason the 152 saw combat was because the enemy was flying over their
airfields,  and not traveling 4k miles to front lines.

If  a plane was in PRODUCTION and in Squadron service during WW2, it should be in
AH eventually. Which both F7F and F8F meet.

my point exactly :old:
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2010, 03:00:00 PM »
the only reason the 152 saw combat was because the enemy was flying over their
airfields,  and not traveling 4k miles to front lines.

If  a plane was in PRODUCTION and in Squadron service during WW2, it should be in
AH eventually. Which both F7F and F8F meet.

It's still a  just "what if".
You could take that even further "The only reason the Do 335 didn't see combat was because the factory was bombed."


The "it had to see action" rule is a very reasonable one. Either a weapon did see combat... or it did not.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2010, 03:19:09 PM »
It's still a  just "what if".

Speaking of what if... What if Spitfires fought Mustangs? What if Hellcats fought Yaks? What if FW-190s fought N1K2s? That's just three examples that this sim is nothing but what ifs happening every minute.
As it is now the most popular part of this sim seems to be a fantasy war between three fantasy countries all flying the same aircraft. I don't understand how aircraft like the F8F, F7F, P-80, Gloster Meteor, DO-335, or any other aircraft  flying when the war ended could damage the historical integrity of a sim that's all fantasy anyway.  :headscratch:

Just saying...

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2010, 03:28:31 PM »
Speaking of what if... What if Spitfires fought Mustangs? What if Hellcats fought Yaks? What if FW-190s fought N1K2s? That's just three examples that this sim is nothing but what ifs happening every minute.
As it is now the most popular part of this sim seems to be a fantasy war between three fantasy countries all flying the same aircraft. I don't understand how aircraft like the F8F, F7F, P-80, Gloster Meteor, DO-335, or any other aircraft  flying when the war ended could damage the historical integrity of a sim that's all fantasy anyway.  :headscratch:

Just saying...

That is a damn good point.

I never thought of that before.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2010, 03:30:30 PM »
Speaking of what if... What if Spitfires fought Mustangs? What if Hellcats fought Yaks? What if FW-190s fought N1K2s? That's just three examples that this sim is nothing but what ifs happening every minute.
As it is now the most popular part of this sim seems to be a fantasy war between three fantasy countries all flying the same aircraft. I don't understand how aircraft like the F8F, F7F, P-80, Gloster Meteor, DO-335, or any other aircraft  flying when the war ended could damage the historical integrity of a sim that's all fantasy anyway.  :headscratch:

Just saying...

Ok. Bring on the F-22 to the MA!  :rock  ;)

Or more serious: This game isn't simulating WWII, just equipment that was used WWII.
And true, a "must have seen combat" is just a deliberately set rule. But I like it, because it's a very simple and clear one. Once you go further it's getting less and less clear. Did it equip a squadron? Was it really combat ready? Or do we end up with "prototype has flown"? (This is a discussion very similar to the "be on pavement to get safe landing" one)
Personally, I'd love to fly a Do 335, but in my opinion it's juts beyond the scope. I'd even prefer the addition of important planes that actually played a important role (Ki 43, Do 217 and so on) over adding planes like the He 162 (which actually did see combat).

YMMV, and maybe HiTechs will do too, some day ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2010, 03:57:55 PM »
I'd even prefer the addition of important planes that actually played a important role (Ki 43, Do 217 and so on) over adding planes like the He 162 (which actually did see combat).

YMMV, and maybe HiTechs will do too, some day ;)

I agree with you, I'd prefer to have the aircraft that played a significant historical role first and foremost.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline SpiveyCH

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
      • http://www.chawks.org
Re: F7F Tigercat!!
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2010, 04:19:24 PM »
Marine Corps night fighter squadron VMF(N)-513 flying F7F-3N Tigercats saw action in the early stages of the Korean War, flying night interdiction and fighter missions and shooting down two Polikarpov Po-2 biplanes. This was the only combat use of the aircraft.
SpiveyCH
The 364th C-HAWKS Fighter Group