@ Motherland.
Thanks for taking the time out of your day to lend a hand on my K4.
I have a boat load of books and many many line drawings specific to K4s. After your post I referred to them to confirm.
Some times one cant see the trees through the forest.
Thanks for your keen attention to detail.
I was so caught up in the texture I missed the basics on the cross.
I was aware of the mapping issues and the radio port and a bunch of other things on my punch list..... but I totally overlooked the cross location , and the black banding
Your attention to detail is constructive and helpful to all.
One question on the radio port.... I have a side view BW photo of the Red Tulip k4... in it the radio port is in the new location as I have it, but its more square not tapered as seen in many line drawings.
On another page in the same book there is another k4 side view and the port is clearly tapered as in the line drawings. Why is that?
I tend to trust the photos over line drawings and the photographic evidence leads me to believe there was a change in batches. Any thoughts?
Also regarding the under wing crosses the type varies from from K4 to K4 in photos.
On this particular air craft what under cross would you think was used?
luffte cammo and markings 33-45 and Last Eagles recommend the simple cross. What is your view on this?
Thanks again
Rave
Give and take... or take and give
On another page in the same book there is another k4 side view and the port is clearly tapered as in the line drawings. Why is that?
I tend to trust the photos over line drawings and the photographic evidence leads me to believe there was a change in batches. Any thoughts?
I can only speculate...
Though the K series was much more standardized than G series, the hatch shape is a relatively small detail so I would imagine it's maybe just factory, or even batch preference....
Also regarding the under wing crosses the type varies from from K4 to K4 in photos.
On this particular air craft what under cross would you think was used?
Again late war variation rears its head
I kind of sucks that they didn't photograph these aircraft with our needs in mind, catching all of these details
Personally I generally match the fuselage and lower wing styles (with exception/variation of course). I think that would be the best way to go, personally.