Author Topic: How about the Bristol Blenheim?  (Read 1247 times)

Offline Biggles

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • Muzak
How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« on: March 30, 2010, 05:14:51 PM »
One of the most maligned aircraft of the war, yet one of the most stoic. We need it!  :rock

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2010, 12:44:42 AM »
One of the most maligned aircraft of the war, yet one of the most stoic. We need it!  :rock
The Wellington would be a far better addition.  It was the backbone of RAF Bomber command early in the war and more Wellingtons were built than any other British bomber.  Further, it has characteristics that would make it an excellent fit in early war scenarios.

1) It is slow enough for early war Axis fighters to actually catch, unlike the existing Boston Mk III.
2) It carries a useful war load of 4,400lbs, unlike the existing Boston Mk III or proposed Blenheim Mk I.
3) It carries an adequate defensive armament for an early war scenario bomber, two .303s in the nose turret, four .303s in the tail turret and one .303 in each beam as compared to two .303s in a dorsal turret for the Boston and Blenheim.
4) It was an extremely rugged bomber able to absorb substantial damage, unlike the Blenheim and significantly more robust than the Boston.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2010, 12:55:53 AM »
One of the most maligned aircraft of the war, yet one of the most stoic. We need it!  :rock

The Blenheim crews who had to take them into combat didn't want them much after a mission or two.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Grendel

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
      • http://www.compart.fi/icebreakers
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2010, 11:30:39 AM »
The Blenheim crews who had to take them into combat didn't want them much after a mission or two.

So, they rebelled? Or continued flying, mm?

Blenheims were still flying combat sorties in Finnish Air Force in 1945, by the way.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2010, 02:57:17 PM »
So, they rebelled? Or continued flying, mm?

Blenheims were still flying combat sorties in Finnish Air Force in 1945, by the way.

Continued flying it naturally.  My point is in reference to the OP saying "we need it!" 

Having read a bit about the early Blenheim ops, it's clear those guys faced some incredible odds.  Performance wise it just couldn't do the job
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2010, 03:12:00 PM »
I stand by my position that anybody advocating for an early war British bomber should be asking for the Wellington B.Mk III.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2010, 06:15:23 PM »
A Wellington B.Mk.I, Ic or II would be earlier-war then the B.Mk.III.

 ;)
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2010, 06:31:01 PM »
A Wellington B.Mk.I, Ic or II would be earlier-war then the B.Mk.III.

 ;)
Would be earlier, but not as useful overall.  I think the Mk III gives the best bang for the buck.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2010, 07:50:23 PM »
"Having read a bit about the early Blenheim ops, it's clear those guys faced some incredible odds."

They did indeed, none more so than Flying Officer Arthur Stewart King 'Pongo' Scarf of 62 Squadron RAF in Malaya, who took off from Butterworth as a bombing attack by the IJAAF destroyed all the other Blenheims about to join him. He flew Blenheim Mk.I L1134 PT-F low-level to Singora, his gunner fighting off several fighter attacks on the way, and carried out an accurate bomb-run there despite more attacks by Japanese fighters which mortally wounded him and left the Blenheim in such a state that the fighters considered their job done and the bomber was going down into the jungle. It didn't turn out that way. With his navigator supporting him in his seat, Scarf somehow held on and managed to make a wheels-up landing near the service hospital at Alor Star airfield, where medical staff that included his wife Elizabeth 'Sally' Scarf lifted him from what was left of the cockpit. He died on the operating table a few minutes later, after he'd squeezed her hand and told her 'Keep smiling, Sal'.

All at Alor Star were taken prisoner by the Japanese shortly afterwards and the story of Scarf's last sortie didn't reach the RAF authorities until 1946. His Victoria Cross was presented to Sally at an investiture on 30 July that year.

What a player.  :salute     
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2010, 09:28:17 AM »
I met this Blenheim Pilot (600 sqn BoB veteran) at Duxford in the year 2000. I managed to get an excellent photograph of him, which I later showed to a friend who flew Spitfires in WWII. He looked at the picture and said something like "A Blenheim Pilot? And he's alive!"
Anyway, if this was a wishlist, I go with Karnak. The Wellington would do it. Might need some gunnery/damage modelling, since cannon shells would only explode on some parts, - which was a part of it's ruggedness ;)
The Stirling would though IMHO do even more, but that's another story.
BTW, did some Wellingtons carry torps?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline SDGhalo

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2010, 10:55:41 AM »
yes the wellington did carry torpedos but that was on in the coastal command variant

Coastal Command variants
Type 429 Wellington GR Mark VIII
Mark IC conversion for Coastal Command service. Roles included reconnaissance, anti-submarine and anti-shipping attack. A Coastal Command Wimpy was the first aircraft to be fitted with the anti-submarine Leigh light. 307 built built at Weybridge, 58 fitted with the Leigh Light.
Type 458 Wellington GR Mark XI
Maritime version of B Mark X with an ordinary nose turret and mast radar ASV Mark II instead of chin radome, no waist guns, 180 built at Weybridge and Blackpool.
Type 455 Wellington GR Mark XII
Maritime version of B Mark X armed with torpedoes and with a chin radome housing the ASV Mark III radar, single nose machine gun, 58 built at Weybridge and Chester.
Type 466 Wellington GR Mark XIII
Maritime version of B Mark X with an ordinary nose turret and mast radar ASV Mark II instead of chin radome, no waist guns, 844 built Weybridge and Blackpool.
Type 467 Wellington GR Mark XIV
Maritime version of B Mark X with a chin radome housing the ASV Mark III radar and added RP-3 explosive rocket rails to the wings, 841 built at Weybridge, Chester and Blackpool.
the blenheim though was an excellent training platorm used for bombing, gunnery, navigation and radio operator trainer, and it was a target tug in the BCATP

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2010, 10:55:06 AM »
TorpedOES means more than one. interesting.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2010, 01:55:17 AM »
add the wellington and/or the beaufort... :aok
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2010, 07:40:12 AM »
"Having read a bit about the early Blenheim ops, it's clear those guys faced some incredible odds."

They did indeed, none more so than Flying Officer Arthur Stewart King 'Pongo' Scarf of 62 Squadron RAF in Malaya, who took off from Butterworth as a bombing attack by the IJAAF destroyed all the other Blenheims about to join him. He flew Blenheim Mk.I L1134 PT-F low-level to Singora, his gunner fighting off several fighter attacks on the way, and carried out an accurate bomb-run there despite more attacks by Japanese fighters which mortally wounded him and left the Blenheim in such a state that the fighters considered their job done and the bomber was going down into the jungle. It didn't turn out that way. With his navigator supporting him in his seat, Scarf somehow held on and managed to make a wheels-up landing near the service hospital at Alor Star airfield, where medical staff that included his wife Elizabeth 'Sally' Scarf lifted him from what was left of the cockpit. He died on the operating table a few minutes later, after he'd squeezed her hand and told her 'Keep smiling, Sal'.

All at Alor Star were taken prisoner by the Japanese shortly afterwards and the story of Scarf's last sortie didn't reach the RAF authorities until 1946. His Victoria Cross was presented to Sally at an investiture on 30 July that year.

What a player.  :salute     

great story,  :salute FO Scarf
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15657
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: How about the Bristol Blenheim?
« Reply #14 on: April 12, 2010, 04:23:49 PM »
what a guy   :salute

+1 to ANY British aircraft   ;)
The Few ***
F.P.H