I held myself out as NO authority. Once someone puts something out there, it is what it is...whether you intended it to sound that way or not. I can't control what you type...I can only control the many ways to interpret it and you left very little room Bagrat...now, thats the way I read it. That is why I put the disclaimer in there that some might think otherwise, true or untrue, and if you gave what you wrote to 100 people to read after they read your PEDO BEAR post, IMO, they wouldnt have too much room either. Hey...you don't have to listen to me bro....call Skuzzy and have him read the thread...if he says, "Nope, all sounds good and easy to me!!", I will absolutely stand corrected right here in front of everyone. I have NO issues with being wrong...and let me be clear...I am NOT accusing Bagrat of being a pedofile....I am saying the posts sound that way. There is a difference. A good example is the way some of us, wrongly, talk about women, we sound like sex addicts.
I'm just saying people read things differently...I think you know that. Honestly...please read the thread all over again from top to bottom. It sounds wrong...it just does. That being said, sounding bad doesn't mean it was intended that way and I get that.
Penguin - I was talking about Bagrat, not Pacman....no big deal.