Well if you took the time to read my original post, I specifically asked not to be flamed for my opinion about safety gear. I'll try to make my point in a different way here. First off, I'm not telling ANYBODY not to take necessary precautions, but at the same time I also believe there is such a thing as going too far, and society these days has a tendency to do just that. Also keep in mind I'm not talking about racing, or motorcross, or any of the like as those are different circumstances altogether.. I'm talking about NORMAL RESPONSIBLE street riding.
If you're involved in an accident, of course a half helmet isn't going to be as safe as a full helmet... and of course wearing no jacket isn't going to be as safe as wearing one, but this doesn't take into account comfort. So what? You might say... lack of comfort is a small price to pay to be safe. I say WRONG! For two reasons... for one lack of comfort makes it HARDER TO RIDE which in my opinion makes your more prone to get into an accident. And for two it takes the fun out of it. It may sound dumb, but really... what's the point in riding if you're not having fun? Now if your sole reason for riding is to 'save the earth by using less fuel'... well then by all means load yourself down with all the safety gear you can.
Take the helmet for example. Yes... OBVIOUSLY a half helmet isn't as safe as a full helmet if you get into an accident, but that's the hitch... you have to be in the accident for that to factor in. Am I self-centered enough to believe that I will never get in a bike accident? HECK NO! But... I'll say it again... when wearing a full helmet I lose a lot of my sense of hearing... my sense of feel... my sense of smell... even my vision seems to be affected somewhat and because of this I become less alert, which in my opinion greatly INCREASES the change of being in an accident in the first place.
To make a statement like "DOT should stop certifying half-helmets" to me is as ridiculous as wearing a space suit on a 100 degree day. Nobody is arguing that it's not a pretty sight, and nobody is arguing that motorcycles are dangerous, but seriously the line has to be drawn somewhere, or else we'll all be riding around with a safety cage around us. Then a bike will catch fire and somebody will be trapped in that cage and it will open a whole new debate.
Really, what it all comes down to is personal preference, acceptance of risk, and common sense. Somewhere there is a balance between safety and rideability. If you feel safer wearing all the 'recommended' gear, then by all means do it. If you find that wearing all of the 'recommended' gear inhibits your ability to properly operate the bike, then by all means scale back.
Let's make another example here. Let's say that BOB has $2000 to spend on a motorcycle. He finds one for $1800, leaving him with $200 to purchase the necessary gear. Is he better off:
1> Spending $200 on helmets, gloves, coats, space suits, etc
2> Spending $100 on basic gear and $100 on a basic rider safety course
or 3> Spending $100 on a basic rider safety course, and $100 on an advanced rider safety course?
Well option 1 looks good, until you find out that he has no practical experience whatsoever... and even with ALL OF THE SAFETY GEAR IN THE WORLD, you're still going to get pretty jacked up hitting the pavement at 40-50+MPH, or slamming head first into a car even at 10mph.
Option 3 looks good, until a car does come out of nowhere and you spill your brains out all over the road
So you pick option 2... to me it's a fair balance considering the options available. Yes some can argue that BOB shouldn't even bother riding until he can afford the bike, all training course, AND all of the 'recommended' gear, but really.. it's not for everyone.