Author Topic: Ability for P-38 to carry troops  (Read 3918 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #60 on: July 01, 2010, 03:07:21 PM »
LMAO...ok. If you had mentioned "Marine ParaRaiders" the first time it might have tipped me off better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramarines
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #61 on: July 01, 2010, 03:20:07 PM »
"Operation Bozo" just might be able to drop SPIZ behind enemy lines after all!!!!!

-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #62 on: July 01, 2010, 03:26:15 PM »
you're a former marine, right?  Surprised you never heard of the Pararaiders from WW2, these were the Marine Raiders that were airborne qualified and actually performed a few drops in the Pacific (think in New Britain or New Guinea).  There were also referred to as "Paramarines" and along with the regular Marine Raiders, disbanded in 1944.

ack-ack
Never heard them called "Pararaiders", wasn't an "official USMC designation". We just call them "Airborne Marines".

They never parachuted into combat, they went in like the rest of the troops.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #63 on: July 01, 2010, 04:04:59 PM »
Never heard them called "Pararaiders", wasn't an "official USMC designation". We just call them "Airborne Marines".

They never parachuted into combat, they went in like the rest of the troops.

I think the official designation was "Paramarines" up until 1944 when all three battalions were disbanded.  I've noticed though, it's the Rangers that usually get the credit or mention for being the first US 'special forces' unit when the credit actually goes to the Marine Raiders.  I also noticed in a lot of articles about the Raiders is that the writes tend to take the tone that these units weren't very successful which led to them being disbanded in 1944, when the opposite is true.  The Raiders and Paramarines are probably one of the most over looked units and almost treated as side shows to the Rangers and US Army airborne units.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #64 on: July 01, 2010, 04:11:33 PM »
how many people pods will it take to kill a tiger?  i dont wanna have to be running back and forth to re-arm when i find out i have to drop like 10 people on a tank. i mean they better pack a punch!
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #65 on: July 01, 2010, 04:14:59 PM »
1st 2nd and 3rd Marine Parachute Batallions.  While they were jump qualified they didn't go in by air at Bougainville.  They were attached to the Raiders for a bit while there.  Later many went to the 5th Marines.  Ira Hayes of Iwo Flag Raising fame was initially a jump qualified Marine. 

At Bougainville, one of the Marine trooper raiding parties was rescued by a PT boat commanded by John F. Kennedy

And AKAK, your contributions to Operation BOZO are noted,  Still going strong, four years later :)

Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline dunnrite

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 909
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #66 on: July 01, 2010, 04:15:08 PM »
Make it like bowling for the base.  Come in low and fast, give it full rudder and let em loose.  Let em roll to the maproom.

Sort of like
Amazing you could actually recruit that much suck into one squad.
Your Proctologist called, they found your head.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #67 on: July 01, 2010, 05:32:09 PM »
how many people pods will it take to kill a tiger?

gastro pods beat people pods all the time  :neener:
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 05:36:31 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #68 on: July 01, 2010, 06:03:22 PM »
gastro pods beat people pods all the time  :neener:

Yeah but they take forever to reach the target.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #69 on: July 01, 2010, 06:26:13 PM »
Yeah but they take forever to reach the target.

ack-ack
:rofl
See Rule #4

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #70 on: July 01, 2010, 06:26:44 PM »
 :cry
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Ability for P-38 to carry troops
« Reply #71 on: July 01, 2010, 07:48:36 PM »
My idea about the p38 blender pods is way cooler akak.  That's what they called them when I at the mcrd in san diego.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.