« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Down

Author Topic: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing  (Read 27116 times)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #75 on: September 21, 2010, 03:43:20 PM »
See Rules #2. #4
« Last Edit: September 22, 2010, 09:20:52 AM by Skuzzy »
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #76 on: September 21, 2010, 03:45:17 PM »
See Rules #2, #4
« Last Edit: September 22, 2010, 09:21:03 AM by Skuzzy »
Logged
-AoM-

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #77 on: September 21, 2010, 11:15:54 PM »
On the discussion of laminar flow, how did the Mosquito stack up in comparison to the P51s "laminar flow design"?
Logged
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"
Axis vs Allies

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #78 on: September 22, 2010, 06:46:02 AM »
Quote from: Plazus on September 21, 2010, 11:15:54 PM
On the discussion of laminar flow, how did the Mosquito stack up in comparison to the P51s "laminar flow design"?

It used a "turbulent" RAF-34, according to Dave Lednicer.  Higher drag, possibly higher Clmax, probably more docile stall characteristics.


EDIT:  This is just a comparison of the airfoils, not the aircraft.  The wing and fuselage design of the Mossie, and the resulting aerodynamic efficiency, are another matter all together...
« Last Edit: September 22, 2010, 06:50:14 AM by Stoney »
Logged
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #79 on: September 24, 2010, 09:25:09 PM »
Well, Chalenge as been on the board lately, so I guess his lack of posting is just that he's got nothing to post that is in disagreement with the latest.
Logged

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7000
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #80 on: September 24, 2010, 10:01:13 PM »
Quote from: Brooke on September 24, 2010, 09:25:09 PM
Well, Chalenge as been on the board lately, so I guess his lack of posting is just that he's got nothing to post that is in disagreement with the latest.

This is nothing new.  He will never admit being wrong.  The best you will get out of him is a disappearing act.
Logged

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: The P-51 and its laminar-flow wing
« Reply #81 on: September 25, 2010, 09:21:12 AM »
Quote from: grizz441 on September 24, 2010, 10:01:13 PM
This is nothing new.  He will never admit being wrong.  The best you will get out of him is a disappearing act.

Correct!
Logged
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Up
« previous next »