Author Topic: MK 103 cannon  (Read 4230 times)

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #30 on: November 06, 2010, 10:10:31 PM »
So it is a big part of the history even though most 410's don't know what it is?

Please, explain? 
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #31 on: November 06, 2010, 10:11:31 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: November 08, 2010, 09:15:17 AM by Skuzzy »
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #32 on: November 06, 2010, 10:12:00 PM »
Whoa, hold it, hold it.

Both statements are NOT contradicting each other. Most 410's did not carry the Mk103, but it's still a very big part of it's history.


Ignore him.. he's flamebaiting and trolling because he didn't get instant recognition in his wishlist post as a genius. Now he's lashing out because I called him out in another post.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #33 on: November 06, 2010, 10:12:42 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: November 08, 2010, 09:15:29 AM by Skuzzy »
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #34 on: November 06, 2010, 10:13:10 PM »
So it is a big part of the history even though most 410's don't know what it is?

Please, explain? 

You lost me.

Can you call a certain piece of equipment only "big part of it's history" if most/all carried it?
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #35 on: November 06, 2010, 10:14:59 PM »
He didn't say the mk103 was a big part of history, he said it's relationship with the me410 is a big part of history.  You have directly contradicted that statement with your own sir. 

You lost me.

Can you call a certain piece of equipment only "big part of it's history" if most/all carried it?
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #36 on: November 06, 2010, 10:15:44 PM »
He didn't say the mk103 was a big part of history, he said it's relationship with the me410 is a big part of history.  You have directly contradicted that statement with your own sir.  


Read my post again. I said "It's" (=Me 410) history. And then answer my question again. :)

And tell me where I contradicted that. :)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #37 on: November 06, 2010, 10:16:06 PM »
 :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:



ten of em seemed good enough for this
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #38 on: November 06, 2010, 10:21:18 PM »
And after you said that I asked you to explain..........  Because what you said was basically "Very few used it but it is still a big part of the history of the plane."  Right, that's what you're saying, but how? Please explain.


Whoa, hold it, hold it.

Both statements are NOT contradicting each other. Most 410's did not carry the Mk103, but it's still a very big part of it's history.
Read my post again. I said "It's" (=Me 410) history. And then answer my question again. :)

And tell me where I contradicted that. :)
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #39 on: November 06, 2010, 10:23:53 PM »
Because what you said was basically "Very few used it but it is still a big part of the history of the plane."

I did not say "very few used it"

The only mention of the word few was "With the 410A, only a few planes carried the 103"

Later I said that I personally estimate the number of Mk 103 equipped planes in the rage of about 200. (out of ~1200)

That's not all, that's not "most", but still a big part of the 410's history.  :)




« Last Edit: November 06, 2010, 10:25:56 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #40 on: November 06, 2010, 10:25:05 PM »
And still waiting for the explanation of how it is a big part of 410 history......
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #41 on: November 06, 2010, 10:26:12 PM »
And still waiting for the explanation of how it is a big part of 410 history......

See above.


Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #42 on: November 06, 2010, 10:27:01 PM »
 :lol

 :cheers:

 :salute
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #43 on: November 06, 2010, 10:27:54 PM »
:cheers:

Don't drink and drive, err post on the AH BBS!  :old:
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: MK 103 cannon
« Reply #44 on: November 06, 2010, 10:45:35 PM »
Footage of HS 129 using the Mk 103: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNYemXJ7jmE
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman