Votes would be weighted based on time subscribed. There would be a factor assigned. That would mean that they are never equal.
First, read carefully, then comprehend what is being said. If you do, maybe you won't make silly comments like the one above. You obviously think that it is because I wanted a fighter that I am not happy. That is a preconceived notion based on prejudice. From my real life experience, I have come to know that only ignorant people jump to conclusions based on prejudices. For that very reason I was going to wait and see what type of people will be flying the B-29 before I made my final judgement, but I must say you are confirming my suspicions.
Btw, I voted for the He-111. That kind of blows away your "fighter" theory doesn't it?
Based on your theory, a guy has been a subscriber for 8 years. But however he rarely plays but maybe a night or two a week. He has somewhat of a knowledge of WWII. But is a loner and doesn't contribute much to the game due to his inactivity.
Now you take a guy who has been a subscriber for 4 years, He plays the game every night. Runs his own squad and adds a ton of fun and variability to the game.
The first guy will get more votes or his vote will be weighted more than guy number 2 just based on his subcriber length???
HELL! I wish politics were like that!
The fact is that you can NOT alienate potential new long term subscribers by saying there vote will not be considered as equal as someone elses. This is NOT an incintive it would be the opposite. You think people would really throw out 15$ bucks a month just so they could get a bigger say in a vote? Of course not, they throw their 15$ out because of the game. My 15$ is just as equal as yours. The reason why HTC is in business is just as much as my doing as yours, regardless of length of subscribing.