« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Very important B-29 question.  (Read 2679 times)

Offline beau32

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 615
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2011, 05:03:13 PM »
Quote from: fullmetalbullet on February 20, 2011, 04:56:57 PM
no B2 has ever crashed. the amount of computers on that thing pretty much keeps it in the air no matter what.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZCp5h1gK2Q


You dont get out much do you?

Funny thing is moisture in the computer system is what caused it to crash.
Logged
"There is always a small microcosm of people who need to explain away their suckage."

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2011, 05:38:46 PM »
Quote from: beau32 on February 20, 2011, 05:03:13 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZCp5h1gK2Q


You dont get out much do you?

Funny thing is moisture in the computer system is what caused it to crash.

that is why i dont drink at the computer desk, im not saying they were drinking at the controls. i guess i was wrong, that makes 20 B2 bombers now. and i do get out alot.
Logged
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2011, 11:48:47 PM »
Quote from: beau32 on February 20, 2011, 05:03:13 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZCp5h1gK2Q


You dont get out much do you?


It practically happened before he was born.

Cameraman on that clip seriously needs to be reassigned.


wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2011, 11:52:08 PM »
Quote from: AWwrgwy on February 20, 2011, 11:48:47 PM
It practically happened before he was born.

Cameraman on that clip seriously needs to be reassigned.


wrongway

hardly thats was in the 90s from the look of it.
Logged
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2011, 11:57:00 PM »
Quote from: fullmetalbullet on February 20, 2011, 11:52:08 PM
hardly thats was in the 90s from the look of it.

At the beginning it says it was in 2008
Logged
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2011, 12:04:56 AM »
Quote from: fullmetalbullet on February 19, 2011, 06:20:30 PM
And the most exspensive project. i believe 2 billion dollars were spent on it. how much would that be in todays money?

$2.04bn on the B-29A alone (not the aiming device) but the Manhattan project was much more expensive $20bn.
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #21 on: February 21, 2011, 12:33:16 AM »
Quote from: Chalenge on February 21, 2011, 12:04:56 AM
$2.04bn on the B-29A alone (not the aiming device) but the Manhattan project was much more expensive $20bn.

i ment the most expencive aircraft project.
Logged
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar

Offline VonKost

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #22 on: February 21, 2011, 08:25:44 AM »
Quote from: Chalenge on February 21, 2011, 12:04:56 AM
$2.04bn on the B-29A alone (not the aiming device) but the Manhattan project was much more expensive $20bn.


This is wrong. The B-29 project was more expensive than the Manhattan project. Off hand I thin is was 3.6 Billing to around 3 Billion
Logged

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #23 on: February 21, 2011, 08:26:50 AM »
Quote from: fullmetalbullet on February 21, 2011, 12:33:16 AM
i ment the most expencive aircraft project.

you have to decide first what is worth now a B dollars of those times.

I vote XB-71 Valkyrie  :aok Although I think the current F-35 project beats them all.
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #24 on: February 21, 2011, 08:59:08 AM »
Quote from: Noir on February 21, 2011, 08:26:50 AM
I vote XB-71 Valkyrie

Wasn't the Valkyrie the XB-70?

Impressive aircraft, definitely interesting to look at if you are ever near Wright-Patterson AFB.
Logged

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2011, 09:21:51 AM »
Quote from: PFactorDave on February 21, 2011, 08:59:08 AM
Wasn't the Valkyrie the XB-70?

Impressive aircraft, definitely interesting to look at if you are ever near Wright-Patterson AFB.

I stand corrected. I doubt I'll ever get there, but I'll keep that in mind  :aok The plane and the technology used are awesome!
Logged
now posting as SirNuke

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2011, 03:46:12 PM »
Quote from: VonKost on February 21, 2011, 08:25:44 AM

This is wrong. The B-29 project was more expensive than the Manhattan project. Off hand I thin is was 3.6 Billing to around 3 Billion
you guys have to stop changing your mind on how much it costs, I have already converted 2 billion 1945 dollars to Preasent day rubles, there is no turning back now  :old:
Logged
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2011, 08:08:40 PM »
Quote from: VonKost on February 21, 2011, 08:25:44 AM

This is wrong. The B-29 project was more expensive than the Manhattan project. Off hand I thin is was 3.6 Billing to around 3 Billion

No... it did in fact cost 20bn and yes Wiki has it wrong. Check Brookings instead of that HACK website:

http://www.brookings.edu/projects/archive/nucweapons/50.aspx
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2011, 02:58:27 AM »
"Check Brookings instead of that HACK website"

Wiki's source for expenditure:

Schwartz, Stephen I. (1998), Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press

 :rolleyes:

-C+
Logged
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Very important B-29 question.
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2011, 07:03:48 AM »
wiki says $1.8bn, Brookings says $21bn.

they are both correct.

I'll let you work out why.
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »