Author Topic: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class  (Read 2347 times)

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2011, 08:33:00 PM »
I agree 100 Scotty, listing ships, reduced speeds and and reduced steering. Anything to bring the sea experience to next level.
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline Rhah

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 268
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2011, 09:37:38 PM »
if we're going to have Bismarck, we should have Hood and Price of Wales too :)

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

The Hood was a heavy Cruiser...
Kommando Nowotny


Your level of fail is increasing exponentially with every subsequent post

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2011, 09:46:34 PM »
i agree. but first they need to make the ships bigger. they seem a bit smaller then the RL ones.
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2011, 10:10:49 PM »
alright, so your idea has been implemented. youve been hit towrds the engines on the port side: youre listing and dead in the water. because ships have a regenerate thing, it (the battleship) would right itself and regain steam after a bit? does that make sense at all?

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2011, 10:17:54 PM »
alright, so your idea has been implemented. youve been hit towrds the engines on the port side: youre listing and dead in the water. because ships have a regenerate thing, it (the battleship) would right itself and regain steam after a bit? does that make sense at all?

Yes it makes sense.  US Navy damage control parties did excellent jobs of repairing ships and getting them righted and back under power (though at a reduced speed at times).  Take the Yorktown for example in WWII at the Coral Sea, it was damaged repaired underway and thus saved from sinking.  I can see that the reapirs be limited to less than top speed, not 100% firepower, and such things to make it real.  But yes it does make sense to have ships repair/regenerate.

BigKev

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2011, 11:14:59 PM »
The Hood was a heavy Cruiser...

battlecruiser, but I reckon anything with 8 15" guns is worth having :D
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2011, 11:51:52 PM »
battlecruiser, but I reckon anything with 8 15" guns is worth having :D

Correct.   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Scotty55OEFVet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2011, 12:27:17 AM »
Yes it makes sense.  US Navy damage control parties did excellent jobs of repairing ships and getting them righted and back under power (though at a reduced speed at times).  Take the Yorktown for example in WWII at the Coral Sea, it was damaged repaired underway and thus saved from sinking.  I can see that the reapirs be limited to less than top speed, not 100% firepower, and such things to make it real.  But yes it does make sense to have ships repair/regenerate.

BigKev
:aok
"War can only be abolished through war...in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."



RedDevil

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2011, 04:07:15 PM »
but if they put legitimate sea battles into aces high, between ships and such, there would be diffrent sides having different classes of ships, correct?
so if it was, say the Yamamoto class against a South Dakota class battlship, the south dakota class would have better fire control, but the japanese ship doesn't? or is that just to complicated?  :headscratch:

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2011, 06:52:51 PM »
The problem with big guns would be the total lack of any type of realistic range finding.  You could use them for shore bombardment, but unless someone runs a CV group or another BB group right up close to you the chance of getting hits on ships at long range would be pretty poor.  An Iowa BB might be interesting - certainly the massive amount of AAA on it would make dive bombing a challenge. 

Offline Dadsguns

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1979
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2011, 06:59:27 PM »
Its a good idea and I like it, but why go through all the time and effort and hope to play with something like that when all that the land grabber types wants to be done with them is steal them and hide them thus taking them out of the game as it is.  Its not about the fight, its about what they can take out of the fight. 

Some of the 91st and maybe even 1fer1 might be able to elaborate on how they feel about combat and avoiding it at all cost....  :rolleyes:


"Your intelligence is measured by those around you; if you spend your days with idiots you seal your own fate."

Offline shermanjr

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 341
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #26 on: February 25, 2011, 04:28:09 PM »
that would be great being able to damage parts of a ship but would that create a holw new dymanic of ship sinking
475th fg dgs
404th fighter group Winter SKy Deth ground
361 st fg
1st pursuit squadron avg
+flyingfury+ main arena
in game name pattonjr

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #27 on: February 25, 2011, 05:53:21 PM »
Also Subs would be nice to see aswell, maybe torpedoes launched from the ship decks. idk what ships had torpedo launchers on them, but i do know some US warships had them in WW2.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2011, 07:07:51 PM by fullmetalbullet »
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2011, 06:53:16 PM »
the RN used torps from destroyers.
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Iowa Class/Bismark Class/Yamoto Class
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2011, 08:20:43 PM »
Japanese destroyers were torpedo first, guns second.  Just finished reading "Neptune's Inferno" by James Hornfischer, who also wrote "Ghost Ship" and "Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors".  A common theme throughout was the use of torpedos by the Japanese and their effectiveness.  Obviously US Destroyers used them as well along with some cruisers.  The between the wars BBs had torpedos initially but they were removed long before WW2
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters