Author Topic: Ju-52  (Read 4217 times)

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Ju-52
« on: March 09, 2011, 08:21:56 PM »
wishing for an axis cargo transport... :pray: could i hear some thoughts other than "update the ones we have"?

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2011, 08:22:37 PM »
DEFINITE +1. :aok
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2011, 08:24:45 PM »
1. It's corrugated for safety.
2. Three engines are better than two.
3. It has a bb gun to make noise with.

 :banana:


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2011, 08:32:53 PM »
not only for those reasons, wrongway, but it [the 7e] carries an extra 2,000 pounds or so. than the C-47

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2011, 08:41:34 PM »
That doesn't mean that it will end up carrying more troops, more V-sups or more field sups.  Though...maybe they could have it carry more v-sups?  That's the only difference that would probably be between the C-47 and the Ju-52 in terms of cargo.
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2011, 08:47:06 PM »
yeah... only room for 18 on the 52, but it is defended, however lightly--1- 5 MGs/20mmMG151

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2011, 08:51:52 PM »
That doesn't mean that it will end up carrying more troops, more V-sups or more field sups.  Though...maybe they could have it carry more v-sups?  That's the only difference that would probably be between the C-47 and the Ju-52 in terms of cargo.

Supplies and troops are based on what is required not on what the plane or gv could carry.

If you can carry 20 troops it would take 20 troops to take a base instead of ten.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2011, 08:57:58 PM »
Supplies and troops are based on what is required not on what the plane or gv could carry.

If you can carry 20 troops it would take 20 troops to take a base instead of ten.


wrongway

I wasn't saying anything about the number of troops, just the number of v-supplies.  I'm not worried either way.  I DO think the Ju-52 deserves it's place in AH in the future though.
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2011, 09:00:22 PM »
it played a major role pretty much everywhere in europe. malta, poland, spain, france, north africa, STALINGRAD...

Offline Ugly05

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2011, 09:10:17 PM »
Would be a nice addition +1  :joystick:

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2011, 09:11:18 PM »
+1
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline Ugly05

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2011, 07:42:23 AM »
The Junkers Ju. 52/3M with the Pontoons ? Ability to take off land from water would be a different twist to game
 

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2011, 07:57:51 AM »
+1
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2011, 08:14:34 AM »
Supplies and troops are based on what is required not on what the plane or gv could carry.

If you can carry 20 troops it would take 20 troops to take a base instead of ten.


wrongway

Silence!

I want the ability to carry troops AND beer  :aok

 :rofl
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2011, 08:15:36 AM »
Silence!

I want the ability to carry troops AND beer  :aok

 :rofl


You might have drunk troops running to the base instead of the town.   :old:
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s