« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ju-52  (Read 4190 times)

Offline Sakai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2011, 05:16:37 AM »
The biggest thing would be breaking the three engine model taboo.  While there were not a greast number of three engined aircraft, there were some impotant ones and having one might encourage the modeling of the Italian suite of excellent 3 engined medium bombers. 
Logged
"The P-40B does all the work for you . . ."

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #46 on: March 21, 2011, 04:22:48 PM »
yeah, that makes sense... bring on the savoia marchettis!!! :rock
Logged

Offline LLv34_Snefens

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 728
      • Lentolaivue 34
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #47 on: March 21, 2011, 04:40:11 PM »
Just add the He-111 and include it's ability to carry paratroopers. win-win.

Logged
Snefens, Lentolaivue 34.
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

"Luck beats skill anytime"

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #48 on: March 21, 2011, 04:48:18 PM »
that might work too, but, as sakai said, 3 engines on 1 airframe would be a big leap. and also, i dont know, but im thinking that the He-111 didnt have as great a troop-carrying ability as the Ju-52 :headscratch:
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #49 on: March 22, 2011, 12:47:56 AM »
I would much, much rather see the SM.79-II added as the first three engined aircraft in AH.  It would be vastly more useful.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #50 on: March 22, 2011, 12:53:58 AM »
Quote from: Karnak on March 22, 2011, 12:47:56 AM
I would much, much rather see the SM.79-II added as the first three engined aircraft in AH.  It would be vastly more useful.
+ 36000000
Logged
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline 7super61

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 91
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #51 on: April 04, 2011, 08:34:42 PM »
+1 :confused:
Logged
Im accually vPHANTOM...vulchvulchvulchvul chvulchvulchvulchvulchvulchvu lchvulchvulchvulchvulchvulchv ulchvulchvulchvulchvulchvulch vulchvulchvulch

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #52 on: April 05, 2011, 12:22:18 AM »
Quote from: LLv34_Snefens on March 21, 2011, 04:40:11 PM
Just add the He-111 and include it's ability to carry paratroopers. win-win.



Short Stirling carried paratroopers too :noid
Logged

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Dahl

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Re: Ju-52: Why the Stall?
« Reply #53 on: April 05, 2011, 02:08:32 AM »
 :bhead :bhead :bhead
Why is it that after all these years, HTC still refuses
to model one of the two greatest transports in WWII?
Dave,Roy-we discussed this matter over the phone,
not to mention the many threads posted over the
past years by many people asking:"when will you deliver?"
Yes,we all know the dry stats...Just give us the option.
Logged
"Those who win write the history books."
OK,fine-but how do you land this damned thing?


Jagdgeschwader 11
The Proud,The Strong.

Offline Sakai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: Ju-52
« Reply #54 on: July 18, 2022, 03:28:50 PM »
Latest use of Ju-52 as a bomber was 1950 by the French in Indochina. 
Logged
"The P-40B does all the work for you . . ."
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »