Author Topic: Fiat G.55/l  (Read 3827 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2011, 12:26:49 PM »
Alpini, I don't think you have a good grasp on things. There's a difference between genuinely creative repairs processes and "just randomly cobbling stuff together"....

You seem to think that the chaos at war's end means lack of production. That's not the case.

Getting back on target here:

The G.55 used the same engine as the C.205. The C.205 was cleared for WEP even in 1943. Therefore the G.55 was cleared for WEP. There was no kit or modification, it was simply higher settings that the Italian engine (IT built clone of the DB601) was allowed to run on for a limited 5-minute duration.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #16 on: November 25, 2011, 05:53:08 AM »
Sure is a plane I would love to see :)
JG 52

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #17 on: November 25, 2011, 12:16:20 PM »
+ 1  :aok
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #18 on: November 25, 2011, 12:39:29 PM »
One plane.......

Five b29 victims in one night


Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #19 on: November 25, 2011, 03:03:08 PM »
One plane.......

Five b29 victims in one night

(Image removed from quote.)
what the hell is that plane?
looks like a japaneese copy of the 110 with a single tail and the ki-84's radials.
AoM
City of ice

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #20 on: November 25, 2011, 03:09:26 PM »
what the hell is that plane?
looks like a japaneese copy of the 110 with a single tail and the ki-84's radials.

Nakajima J1N Gekko / IRVING

http://www.aviastar.org/air/japan/nakajima_j1n.php
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #21 on: November 25, 2011, 04:36:16 PM »
One plane.......

Five b29 victims in one night

(Image removed from quote.)

A B-29 could outrun that thing it only does 315
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #22 on: November 25, 2011, 04:40:45 PM »
A B-29 could outrun that thing it only does 315
Unlike AH, bombers didn't run at full power, even in combat.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2011, 05:26:44 PM »
A B-29 could outrun that thing it only does 315

Not sure what information you are looking at but it does 417 with wep at Alt.
JG 52

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2011, 06:22:14 PM »
Not sure what information you are looking at but it does 417 with wep at Alt.

I'd be astounded if that were the case.  No Japanese fighter, to my knowledge, broke 400mph in level flight during WWII.  There is a chance some Ki-84s did, but I've seen no documentation of it.  Certainly an early war twin engined fighter did not.

315-330mph sounds about right for the J1N1.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #25 on: November 25, 2011, 06:54:06 PM »
I'd be astounded if that were the case.  No Japanese fighter, to my knowledge, broke 400mph in level flight during WWII.  There is a chance some Ki-84s did, but I've seen no documentation of it.  Certainly an early war twin engined fighter did not.

315-330mph sounds about right for the J1N1.

Wrong thread bud.
JG 52

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #26 on: November 26, 2011, 09:36:25 AM »
They do it the same way I catch b29s and ar234s with a 110g.

Climb to 34k feet and perform a 500fpm descent when you get visibility of the b29s.

For the ar234 you need to really maximize the efficiency of your chase such that they run out of altitude while you are still at 15k feet and you can close on them as they fly level at sea level.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #27 on: November 26, 2011, 09:39:41 AM »
They do it the same way I catch b29s and ar234s with a 110g.

Climb to 34k feet and perform a 500fpm descent when you get visibility of the b29s.

For the ar234 you need to really maximize the efficiency of your chase such that they run out of altitude while you are still at 15k feet and you can close on them as they fly level at sea level.

b29s are extremely tough challange in chasing, I once had the dubious fun of escorting "air spawned" b29s and above 25k a Hellcat was easily outran, we couldn't climb and stay with them while the defending force was already well above the bombers and waiting.
JG 52

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #28 on: November 26, 2011, 02:25:26 PM »
One plane.......

Five b29 victims in one night

(Image removed from quote.)
If its anything like all the other jap fighters, 1 20mm from the b29s tail gun will set that thing burning.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2011, 02:51:44 PM by Tyrannis »

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #29 on: November 26, 2011, 02:39:17 PM »
+1