Author Topic: Nasa and satellite recycling  (Read 578 times)

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2011, 12:13:45 AM »
No politics in my response

see this

Nasa is the least wasteful entity sponsored by the U.S. Government.

I've been spending a lot of time at Kennedy Space center and nothing is wasted there.

The government should apply Nasa's thriftiness to the rest of thier benefactors and budget shortcomings would become surplus.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6974
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2011, 11:05:41 AM »
None of the managers in the programs mentioned is an elected official.

By your definition, we cannot discuss anything sponsored by the government in any way, shape, or form.

It is you who are politicizing this thread.

I've got an idea........Lets talk about NASA's recycling and repurposing of assets
« Last Edit: October 18, 2011, 11:15:46 AM by icepac »

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2011, 11:20:29 AM »
Nasa is the least wasteful entity sponsored by the U.S. Government.

I've been spending a lot of time at Kennedy Space center and nothing is wasted there.

The government should apply Nasa's thriftiness to the rest of thier benefactors and budget shortcomings would become surplus.
you can't be talking about nasa..."least wasteful"? "thrifty"?  :lol   :rofl   you should go to the nasa facilities where there are no propaganda ministers.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Flipperk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2011, 11:39:24 AM »
you can't be talking about nasa..."least wasteful"? "thrifty"?  :lol   :rofl   you should go to the nasa facilities where there are no propaganda ministers.


Been in nearly all of the NASA buildings in Houston...no, not the tours either... My fiances' Father and Mother both work for NASA contractors, SAIC and Jacobs Technologies, and are located on-sight. You should really find a friend who will let you in with a visitors pass, and just walk around any NASA facility... it is quite remarkable.

I promise you that his response is pretty spot on, out of all of the agencies, NASA is probably the least wasteful.

« Last Edit: October 18, 2011, 11:45:00 AM by Flipperk »
It is 2 Cents or .02 Dollars...NOT .02 Cents!

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2011, 11:56:58 AM »
Been in many of the NASA buildings in Houston...no, not the tours either... My fiances' Father and Mother both work for NASA contractors, SAIC and Jacobs Technologies, and are located on-sight. You should really find a friend who will let you in with a visitors pass, and just walk around any NASA facility... it is quite remarkable.

I promise you that his response is pretty spot on, out of all of the agencies, NASA is probably the least wasteful.
you must be mistakenly under the impression that i have never been to a nasa facility. they have had to revise their spending practices over the past 10 years but not to the extent it could be done. like every other agency, if they don't spend the money they won't get more. and like every other government agencey, over priced contractors are part of the wasteful spending. the r&d facilities blow more money than the dea.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6974
Re: Nasa and satellite recycling
« Reply #20 on: October 18, 2011, 12:16:53 PM »
Actually....they have had to revise thier spending practices over the last 39 years.