Author Topic: Chinas J-20  (Read 2347 times)

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #30 on: January 01, 2012, 08:33:21 PM »
Looks like an F22 with an Su-27's rear mounted wings, and an F15 ACTIVE's canards.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2012, 04:17:42 AM »
Wow! I didn't know we had someone on the boards who helped design the Mig-25.  This is awesome.  :rolleyes:

What do you consider extended times then?

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2012, 09:02:38 AM »
For the MiG-25 it would be a few minutes before it suffers from fuel starvation. An F-15C burns up all its internal fuel in about 10 minutes on full AB. The MiG would have less time. The SR-71 was very different thanks to its unique engines. The faster it went, the more fuel-efficient it was in terms of pounds burned per nautical mile traveled. It could cruise at Mach 3+ for more than 2,000 nmi. Conventional designs like the MiG-25 can only dash a short distance at max speed.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6911
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2012, 10:01:13 AM »
1300 mile range at supersonic speeds

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2012, 10:32:40 AM »
That's the RB version with the 5,300 liter droptank at a low-supersonic "supercruise". Not at Mach 3.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline USAF2010

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 171
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2012, 05:45:11 PM »
I'm waiting for someone to speculate on the B-1R coming out...... it's gonna be a monster  :noid
Defensor Fortis - Defenders of the Force
"INCOMING"

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6911
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2012, 07:31:31 AM »
That's the RB version with the 5,300 liter droptank at a low-supersonic "supercruise". Not at Mach 3.

Yes.......and it's still a real mig25 that will go 1200 miles at supersonic speeds.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #37 on: January 04, 2012, 07:17:43 PM »
But not at the speed you claimed...

Mig 25s were clocked at mach 3.2 and possibly mach 3.4 for an extended period of time.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #38 on: January 04, 2012, 07:30:53 PM »
I'm waiting for someone to speculate on the B-1R coming out...... it's gonna be a monster  :noid

Sort of like a super Tu-160!  :aok
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2012, 12:17:50 PM »
No copycat since the mig25 that viktor belenko defected with pre-dated the F15 and inspired it's creation.

Mig 25s were clocked at mach 3.2 and possibly mach 3.4 for an extended period of time.

What I remember hearing while in the Air Force was that the one which landed in Japan was a slow, mostly steel, very little high-tech metals and what was said was that Russia had mass produced these cheap look-a-likes to fool the spy plane/satellite photos examiners into thinking there were dozens of these already produced. Any "Real" demonstrations were done with the few prototypes. Might not have been the Mig-25...? It was a long time ago.  :old: 
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #40 on: January 06, 2012, 08:03:34 AM »
Russian industry has always had problems with production quality. Prototypes is one thing (look at the Su47 f ex) the level of engineering and manufacturing quality in individual a/c built for trials and testing has never been comparable with actual production quality of aircraft delivered to the Soviet/Russian Air Force.

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8525
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #41 on: January 06, 2012, 08:32:16 AM »
The Russians had difficulties welding Titanium alloys at this time so employed thin gauge Stainless Steel instead. Mach 2.8 is a more realistic operational speed for the MiG-25 although it would do 3.2 for a short burst. Any more and the compressor tips would sustain damage. It's interesting that conjecture about what the MiG-25 was and was capable of lead to the F-15 which in turn lead to the MiG-29 and Su-27.

And yes, the J-20 doesn't look right. But neither does the F-35 imho.

”It's a shame that he's gone, but the shame is entirely his”
HiTech 2 - Skyyr 0

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #42 on: January 06, 2012, 10:02:38 AM »
Back on topic- I wonder if it has one of these on the bottom  :lol

InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #43 on: January 06, 2012, 10:10:38 AM »
Back on topic- I wonder if it has one of these on the bottom  :lol

(Image removed from quote.)

Just another term for... slave labor.  ;)

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Chinas J-20
« Reply #44 on: January 06, 2012, 01:28:00 PM »
The Russians had difficulties welding Titanium alloys at this time so employed thin gauge Stainless Steel instead. Mach 2.8 is a more realistic operational speed for the MiG-25 although it would do 3.2 for a short burst. Any more and the compressor tips would sustain damage. It's interesting that conjecture about what the MiG-25 was and was capable of lead to the F-15 which in turn lead to the MiG-29 and Su-27.

And yes, the J-20 doesn't look right. But neither does the F-35 imho.

The main reason they didn't use more titanium was cost-saving. They did use titanium in areas where the heat loading was greatest, like on the leading edges of the wing, and aluminum in cooler areas.

The Sukhoi T-4 was a prototype for a Mach 3 medium range bomber that was largely made from titanium, but as always it was too expensive for the Soviets.



It seems they'd rather sell the titanium to the imperialist-capitalist western pigs so we could make SR-71's from it.  :aok




I've always liked the looks of Sukhoi designs, but I must say the new Sukhoi stealth fighter looks absolutely stunning!  :O

No gods or kings. Only Predator.