Author Topic: 262 base placement  (Read 1231 times)

Offline Tazz69

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 88
262 base placement
« on: January 09, 2012, 01:17:04 PM »
IMHO, i think that Me 262's should ONLY be available at a large air field. During the war, 262's weren't available at every operational base the Germans used. Me109's and Fw190's were the front line planes, not 262's. The fact is that when a raid is inbound to a base, some people up a 262 from the closest base and go goon hunting. I think the 262 should be set to certain bases like the 163 is. They weren't in that much front line use like they were during the war, so why not restrict them to a large field. They'll still be used as much, but will give the pilot less options as to where to go and how fast he will get there. OK, let crap fly! Flame on!



Tazz69, CO
69th FG ~Rampant Lions~
Sic Vic Pacem, Para Bellum ~~~ If You Want Peace, Prepare for War

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2012, 01:21:17 PM »
-1

escort the goon.
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2012, 02:15:24 PM »
There is a reason we have perks, if someone chooses to intercept your horde with a 262 then he risks the perks.

The Me-163 should be the only plane limited to 1 base due to the circumstances around it.

-1 leave the 262 alone
JG 52

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2012, 02:33:31 PM »
+1
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2012, 02:39:56 PM »
-1

escort the goon.

What he said. We got hacked to pieces yesterday, me and 3 other goons... because an escort was being stupid -.-

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2012, 02:46:44 PM »
IMHO, i think that Me 262's should ONLY be available at a large air field. During the war, 262's weren't available at every operational base the Germans used. Me109's and Fw190's were the front line planes, not 262's. The fact is that when a raid is inbound to a base, some people up a 262 from the closest base and go goon hunting. I think the 262 should be set to certain bases like the 163 is. They weren't in that much front line use like they were during the war, so why not restrict them to a large field. They'll still be used as much, but will give the pilot less options as to where to go and how fast he will get there. OK, let crap fly! Flame on!



Tazz69, CO
69th FG ~Rampant Lions~
Sic Vic Pacem, Para Bellum ~~~ If You Want Peace, Prepare for War

If you are going to make claims such as this, please back them up with proof and documentation.  Some type of reference at the very least.

Oh yeah, your Latin is incorrect, also.  Sic Vic is a DJ from Austin, TX.

Perhaps you mean Sic vis pacem, para bellum (which is actually a question)
OR                      Si vis pacem, para bellum  (which is more of a statement)

Carry on   :salute
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2012, 02:53:30 PM »
And yet, at least 8056 bases had been captured by goon in Late War in 2011
Amazing, isn't it? ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2012, 02:54:17 PM »
And yet, at least 8056 bases had been captured by goon in Late War in 2011
Amazing, isn't it? ;)

I demand a pie chart  :furious
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2012, 02:59:02 PM »
Oh yeah, your Latin is incorrect, also.  Sic Vic is a DJ from Austin, TX.

Perhaps you mean Sic vis pacem, para bellum (which is actually a question)
OR                      Si vis pacem, para bellum  (which is more of a statement)

Carry on   :salute


Im used to all the grammar/spelling pedants round here but correcting other peoples latin? classic :rofl

71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2012, 03:00:06 PM »
I demand a pie chart  :furious



So if more than 8,000 goons got through on 2011 (probably more like 9,000 if you take into account those killed while the troops went in), and the 262 was responsible for only 4% of all goon kills... the problem doesn't seem that big anymore.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2012, 03:02:22 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2012, 03:05:55 PM »
I'll bet most of those 4% were against hordes too, I cant be the only one who just flys jets against hordes.
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2012, 03:09:42 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

So if more than 8,000 goons got through on 2011 (probably more like 9,000 if you take into account those killed while the troops went in), and the 262 was responsible for only 4% of all goon kills... the problem doesn't seem that big anymore.

Looks like Dora's should be hamstrung, as well...
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2012, 03:15:10 PM »
By the way.... There were 46 kills of the Me 262 by the C-47 in 2011  :D
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2012, 03:18:47 PM »
I'm claiming at least 2 of those!

... as the jet. dam compressing lw planes :furious
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: 262 base placement
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2012, 06:18:07 PM »
Quote
During the war, 262's weren't available at every operational base the Germans used.

During the war, C-47s with paratroopers weren't available at every operational base the Americans used.


"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."