Author Topic: F6F Hellcat  (Read 16603 times)

Offline pangea

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #135 on: January 27, 2012, 02:49:55 PM »
It is such a micro change it is hard to call it an "improvement".

Agreed.  Wasn't expecting the change to be dramatic, but I don't "see" much of an improvement here.

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #136 on: January 27, 2012, 04:22:18 PM »
It is a little bit better.  Not what it once was and certainly nowhere near as good as the F4U.  Maybe when the Corsair gets remodeled, it will get a similarly limited rear view.
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #138 on: January 27, 2012, 06:22:51 PM »
It is a little bit better.  Not what it once was and certainly nowhere near as good as the F4U.  Maybe when the Corsair gets remodeled, it will get a similarly limited rear view.

Why would the Corsairs get remodeled again? They're already up to 2.0 standard.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #139 on: January 28, 2012, 06:15:45 AM »
Excuse me for asking, but shouldn't the F4U have a better rear view? Bubble canopy and all.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #140 on: January 28, 2012, 07:13:07 AM »
Excuse me for asking, but shouldn't the F4U have a better rear view? Bubble canopy and all.

No because it has that giant piece of metal hanging above your head were glass should be.
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #141 on: January 28, 2012, 08:06:36 AM »
Quote
No because it has that giant piece of metal hanging above your head were glass should be.

Not all versions.



« Last Edit: January 28, 2012, 08:08:30 AM by Slade »
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #142 on: January 28, 2012, 08:51:54 AM »
More correctly, most F4U-4s and some later 1Ds removed that plate entirely. The plate really should be removed from our -4 to be representative of the majority.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17979
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #143 on: January 28, 2012, 08:56:47 AM »
I was a bit disappointed. I got to fly the new patch for the first time last night and the view with TrackIR out the back of an F6 isn't much better. If I could get the same view as the hog I'd be happy. I'd spend a lot more time in that plane if I could see out the back just a bit better.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #144 on: January 28, 2012, 10:07:17 AM »
No because it has that giant piece of metal hanging above your head were glass should be.

Isn't this piece of metal modeled correctly in the game? Having a Malcolm-hood style bubble canopy gives the pilot the advantage of looking back down the side of his aircraft.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #145 on: January 28, 2012, 04:38:10 PM »
Quote
The plate really should be removed from our -4 to be representative of the majority.

+1  :aok
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #146 on: January 28, 2012, 05:13:42 PM »
Not all versions.

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

Only the F2G1 and F2G2 "super Corsairs" built by Good Year powered by P&W R4360's had the bubbly canopy and they never even saw service
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline TequilaChaser

  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10173
      • The Damned - founded by Ptero in 1988
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #147 on: January 29, 2012, 02:29:14 AM »
Only the F2G1 and F2G2 "super Corsairs" built by Good Year powered by P&W R4360's had the bubbly canopy and they never even saw service

got any documents to back that up?

I thought they even went as far as to replacing some of the birdcage canopys on the early F4U-1 models with bubble canopys  in the field as a field modification....

and used the bubble canopy on the F4U-4's & -5's  as well as having most F4U-1D's & -1C's with bubble canopys also.....  with some F4U-1A models thrown in as well

is everyone talking about the same thing here?  bubble canopy  vs bubbily canopy ( is extra buldging bubble outwards )  vs the original birdcage

Saxman?    Widewing?  


TC
"When one considers just what they should say to a new pilot who is logging in Aces High, the mind becomes confused in the complex maze of info it is necessary for the new player to know. All of it is important; most of it vital; and all of it just too much for one brain to absorb in 1-2 lessons" TC

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #148 on: January 29, 2012, 07:44:04 AM »
The Malcolm-hood style bubble canopy (like on the Spit and P-51B/C) could be retrofitted in the field, but a true bubble canopy would require major structural changes to the rear fuselage.

No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: F6F Hellcat
« Reply #149 on: January 29, 2012, 08:27:17 AM »
got any documents to back that up?

I thought they even went as far as to replacing some of the birdcage canopys on the early F4U-1 models with bubble canopys  in the field as a field modification....

and used the bubble canopy on the F4U-4's & -5's  as well as having most F4U-1D's & -1C's with bubble canopys also.....  with some F4U-1A models thrown in as well

is everyone talking about the same thing here?  bubble canopy  vs bubbily canopy ( is extra buldging bubble outwards )  vs the original birdcage

Saxman?    Widewing?  


TC

I learned this from talking with an old guy who flew AU-7s (dedicated ground attack version for the marines) who knows a ton about F4U's and he said that the only ones that had a true bubble canopy were the F2G1 and F2G2.
The Malcolm-hood style bubble canopy (like on the Spit and P-51B/C) could be retrofitted in the field, but a true bubble canopy would require major structural changes to the rear fuselage.

(Image removed from quote.)
  The red one in that picture is an F2G2 that has been modified for air racing.
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales