Author Topic: more tank-destroyers?  (Read 1031 times)

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: more tank-destroyers?
« Reply #30 on: March 07, 2012, 01:41:59 PM »
Great another "can we have another spawn camping toy" thread.


We need another GV in this game about as much as we need an early war plane.

None of these can slug it out with a Tiger2 or out run an M-18....so what's the point in adding them?

If you bothered to up a tank once in a while you'd figure out why mid-higher ranged ENY tanks are a great idea. I only pull out a King Tiger when the situation is dire and I need to stop your horde.
If its an even situation I sit in a Panzer F to perk farm, so I can pull out that Ace in the hole once in a while.

Problem is Panzer F is not a tank destroyer, its a slapped together tank to combat 1942 versions of the KV-1 and T-34 tanks, with an L/43 gun.

Put in a JadgPanzer or Hetzer and you have a nifty little tank that can do what its suppose to do which is ambush tanks, no it won't combat a King Tiger - yet I only see one once or twice a tour? So yeah not worried about king tigers so much.

JG 52

Offline HighTone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
      • Squad Site
Re: more tank-destroyers?
« Reply #31 on: March 07, 2012, 07:38:06 PM »

As for why we should get them: because its not about outperforming another vehicle. If it were, the Tiger II would be the end of the line for WWII vehicles, and the 262 would be it for WWII fighters.




What a gem of wisdom.   :cheers:
 
 Now can we apply that same logic to the airplane set....ahem....maybe an few early war Japanese Army planes/bombers to round out the set. Only now of course, since its not about out preforming the other "vehicle" 



LCA Special Events CO     LCA ~Tainan Kokutai~       
www.lcasquadron.org      Thanks for the Oscar HTC

Offline scottak

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: more tank-destroyers?
« Reply #32 on: March 07, 2012, 07:40:07 PM »



What a gem of wisdom.   :cheers:
 
 Now can we apply that same logic to the airplane set....ahem....maybe an few early war Japanese Army planes/bombers to round out the set. Only now of course, since its not about out preforming the other "vehicle" 

sure. a5m sound good?


Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: more tank-destroyers?
« Reply #33 on: March 08, 2012, 12:31:56 AM »
What a gem of wisdom.   :cheers:
 
 Now can we apply that same logic to the airplane set....ahem....maybe an few early war Japanese Army planes/bombers to round out the set. Only now of course, since its not about out preforming the other "vehicle"



Now if only we could actually make use of those outside of scenarios, you might actually have an argument.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"