Author Topic: Virtual reality that doesn't suck  (Read 1168 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« on: March 13, 2012, 07:12:53 PM »
Virtual reality that doesn't suck

1080p resolutions on screens less than an inch wide.  Even 2048x1536 soon.  Actual commercial hardware isn't here yet, but for the first time usable resolutions may be here soon.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline clerick

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1742
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2012, 07:38:03 PM »
cool stuff, I wonder why they have a TrackIR on the monitor in the picture.

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2012, 08:00:59 PM »
I'd guess the HMD doesn't have motion tracking.  Cool stuff.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline jimson

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7202
      • The Axis vs Allies Arena
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2012, 12:05:25 PM »
This is the one I'm keeping an eye on. Evidently, a new version will have adjustable transparency

http://roadtovr.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/silicon-micro-display-announces-st1080-hmd-with-10-transparent-1080p-displays/#more-147

I think we are finally getting close to usable VR technology
« Last Edit: April 01, 2012, 12:07:23 PM by jimson »

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2012, 12:15:43 PM »
What's the date?

 :noid
« Last Edit: April 01, 2012, 02:17:54 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Flossy

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11070
      • Flossy's Website
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2012, 06:39:42 PM »
Flossy {The Few}
Female Flying For Fun

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9891
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2012, 06:41:11 PM »
I think we are finally getting close to usable VR technology

 :confused:

I've been using VR with AH for 6 years now.

Neither of the above solutions are where things are heading, Vuzix have licensed Waveguide optics (from Nvidia I think) and Waveguide will eat all existing VR displays alive.

Offline jimson

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7202
      • The Axis vs Allies Arena
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2012, 09:26:25 PM »
:confused:

I've been using VR with AH for 6 years now.

Neither of the above solutions are where things are heading, Vuzix have licensed Waveguide optics (from Nvidia I think) and Waveguide will eat all existing VR displays alive.

I know you used the emagin Z800.

I had the Vuzix VR920,  I couldn't read text with it. Just didn't consider it worthwhile, I never tried the emagin as it was like 1500 bucks.

I suppose I should say we are getting closer to affordable VR technology that doesn't suck.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2012, 09:28:17 PM by jimson »

Offline Raphael

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Remember 08/08/2012
 Youtube videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/raphael103/featured
Game ID => Raphael
XO of Jg5

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2012, 11:20:16 AM »
I know you used the emagin Z800.

I had the Vuzix VR920,  I couldn't read text with it. Just didn't consider it worthwhile, I never tried the emagin as it was like 1500 bucks.

I suppose I should say we are getting closer to affordable VR technology that doesn't suck.

I think the Sony HMZ-T1 looks pretty ok.  720p is pretty close to good enough IMO, though obviously more is better.  One of my squaddies has one, says the eyepieces are a bit close together so if you've got widely spaced eyes I'd suggest to try before you buy.

Still, for $600 or so it's not a bad thing.  I doubt I'd use the 3D with AH as my squaddie said it was less than great.  No head tracking either.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9891
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2012, 04:52:29 PM »
I know you used the emagin Z800.

I had the Vuzix VR920,  I couldn't read text with it. Just didn't consider it worthwhile, I never tried the emagin as it was like 1500 bucks.

I suppose I should say we are getting closer to affordable VR technology that doesn't suck.

I now have the Vuzix Wrap 1200, it has it's pro's and con's.

Offline Torquila

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 564
Re: Virtual reality that doesn't suck
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2012, 06:35:03 PM »
Id recommend the Sony HMZ-T1 for more casual things, like the xbox or ps3...

Where it really shines is in games like bf3 where you bring your headset + xbox over to a friends house and you both use an attack heli.