Author Topic: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?  (Read 4694 times)

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17323
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #30 on: July 25, 2012, 01:09:07 PM »
man cockpits had bullet proof glass and yet nobody thought of adding them to the wings and the fuselage to make it tougher.  I wonder if wonder woman's plane was glass just to bounce bullets.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #31 on: July 25, 2012, 01:41:29 PM »
man cockpits had bullet proof glass and yet nobody thought of adding them to the wings and the fuselage to make it tougher.  I wonder if wonder woman's plane was glass just to bounce bullets.


semp
The bullet proof glass is very heavy, hence being limited to the forward screen on fighters.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26834
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #32 on: July 25, 2012, 02:33:53 PM »
The bullet proof glass is very heavy, hence being limited to the forward screen on fighters.

I may be up around Austin this weekend. I'll have to hunt down karnak.... muhahahahahaha.

Just ignore any large white chevy trucks in your vacinity that are being driven by an old ugly redneck guy.   :D
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #33 on: July 25, 2012, 02:51:00 PM »
Just ignore any large white chevy trucks in your vacinity that are being driven by an old ugly redneck guy.   :D
This is Texas.  You just described about 20% of vehicles on the road.  :p
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26834
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #34 on: July 25, 2012, 03:01:28 PM »
This is Texas.  You just described about 20% of vehicles on the road.  :p

I know :D

This should help a little.................

« Last Edit: July 25, 2012, 03:03:45 PM by Shuffler »
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #35 on: July 25, 2012, 06:34:20 PM »
I really think it's gotta be a bug, though. Seems the pilot is 5x larger than the plane. In fact the ONLY time I took a hit and didn't die was from a con below and behind me in a prolonged tail chase. I figure he hit the tail more than the cockpit area.

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #36 on: July 25, 2012, 06:38:39 PM »
 :headscratch:

I've attacked a set of B17s from a dead 6 position and I got hit mutiple times, lost flaps and ailerons and oil, but didn't die.
I got HOed by a Typhoon and killed him, but not before losing oil and an aileron.
I got jumped by a F4U4 and took at least 3 bursts before going down.

I never caught on fire.
I never got insta pilot killed.

I have gotten PW but that was because I was being stupid and attacked buffs from dead 6. Never have I died from a hit that made me go  ":huh", when I died, it was because I screwed up big time (like trying to TnB with a F4U-4 :D). You guys must be in some unlucky situations.  :uhoh

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline M1A1

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #37 on: July 26, 2012, 05:30:43 AM »
Standard load out for .50 cal ammo carried by bombers was a mix of AP or API and tracer. .%0 cal will penetrate bullet proof glass. Put a burts of .50 cal from oh 3 guns what do you have 50 to 100 rounds hitting in generally same area so poof pilot wound and death. You wanna sit back there and snipe you deserve to take onhe in the head. Anyone who thinks .50 cal AP won't penetrate bullet proof glass can ask one of the gunners from my troop who had his knee blown off from a .50 round that went through bullet proof glass in a blue on blue mishap...

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #38 on: July 26, 2012, 05:55:05 AM »
Do you have the image of the armor glass that the caption says is "above"?

Yeh, I'll post it when I get home. It shows a separate armored glass infront of the actual "windshield"/canopy. The description of the aircraft in the same book mentions that a 75mm armored glass was provided.

Something like in this EAW-mod:
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 05:56:42 AM by Wmaker »
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #39 on: July 26, 2012, 06:19:52 AM »
"It might have been accurate but in real life the 50mm wasn't as effective as it is in game.  Pilots had to get in very close to the bombers to aim and fire the 50mm cannon and it had a tendency to jam after a round or two, unlike in here where you can snipe from over a thousand yards away and the gun never jams."

Add to that that the interceptor had to fly in turbulent slipstream of the bomber making the aiming even more difficult.

-C+

"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #40 on: July 26, 2012, 11:27:13 AM »
Here's the pic:
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8054
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #41 on: July 26, 2012, 11:49:34 AM »
Add to that that the interceptor had to fly in turbulent slipstream of the bomber making the aiming even more difficult.
-C+

No agenda question here-  Would following in a buff's wake at 1000 yards be turbulent?

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Alpo

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1406
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #42 on: July 26, 2012, 12:03:46 PM »
Just ignore any large white chevy trucks in your vacinity that are being driven by an old ugly redneck guy.   :D

This is Texas.  You just described about 20% of vehicles on the road.  :p

And 80% of the drivers...

 :cheers:
SkyKnights Fighter Group -CO-
R.I.P.  SKDenny 02/03/1940 - 02/19/2012

...

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #43 on: July 26, 2012, 01:15:25 PM »
Here's the pic:
(Image removed from quote.)
Well, that doesn't look like it would be full protection, just head protection.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 410 vs Buffs tweek the balance?
« Reply #44 on: July 26, 2012, 01:20:26 PM »
There was protection below that glass panel, too. Most of the cockpit area was covered.

I still think it's a bug because even from dead 6 shots the round has to go through the tail, the rear gunner, the gunner's armor plating, the SEAT and headrest (often thick plating), and then kill you -- and it happens instantly before you ever hear a ping. You're just in the tower.


Hence why I cry foul.