I like the fact that in this country the incidence of gun crime is negligable. It has however increased substantially since the draconian private ownership laws were enacted after Micheal Ryan in Hungerford, and especially Thomas Hamilton at Dunblane.
If, however, the government sees fit to allow private firearm ownership for home defence, at any time in the future I guarantee you I will be in the front of the line, and make sure my loved ones know how to acces and use it. If homeowners are expected by criminals to be in possesion of firearms, they are more likely to take the risk of carrying a weapon themselves.
At the moment it's not necessary, and whatever the firearms laws or reasonable force guidelines, you break into my house and threaten my loved ones I promise it will be your last burglary. Britain has recently dealt with a couple of deaths of burgling little turds whilst they were invading peoples homes. Thet aquitted the homeowners who protected themselves.
The problem I foresee is that if government strongly advocates use of force in home defence, it will serve to make criminals arm themselves more effectively.
It is a viscious circle