With all respect, midway, your assertion is based on ungrounded assumptions -
A) that what I'm suggesting won't work as well as what already exists and, therefore
B) it won't see much use, and so
C) it isn't worth the coding time.
So to reply
A) clearly I don't think what what exists works as well as what I'm suggesting. Not everyone has a system which can take advantage of it, but neither am I the only one. Further, I'm not suggesting the existing system change, just that an option exists.
B) there are many features in AH that don't see much use. In fact this is true of any well developed system, software or otherwise. 10% of the features see 90% of the use, which means the other 90% see somewhere between 10% and .1%. What percentage of AH flight hours are done in WWI? At a rough guess well under .1%. Was it worth putting that content together?
C) What's worth coding isn't my call to make, but that call can't be made in an informed and useful way if no-one understands the suggestion in the first place. In fact, several of the responses here have shown that the responder hadn't fully understood what I see as the issue, and thus the solution. That includes Hitech's response about knees, unless he was just being humorous, and I can only presume it >is< ultimately his call. This may be my fault for being insufficiently clear, however it behooves me to make sure the person making the call understands what I'm trying to put forward is clearly understood. This isn't arguing, it's communicating.
Last, nobody's said "No, this won't be done," so actually I haven't been given an answer. I don't even expect an answer, I'm just throwing my thoughts out to the community to improve the game. Right now they're getting rained on by most (but not all!), but maybe someone will take them and come up with a better idea. That's what discussion is for. Pixels are free.
Cheers!