Author Topic: 109E3 inclusion  (Read 2497 times)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2013, 10:25:47 PM »
These don't look
right

They may not be. But I'll support the 'right' one's none-the-less.  :)

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2013, 01:54:37 PM »
Thank you Shida, I'm going to need... some alone time...



I may be a while..


 :rofl :rofl :aok
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Zoney

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6503
Re: 109E3 inclusion
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2013, 08:51:29 AM »
You Axis guys are a funny lot.  You ask for small variations in German stuff to be covered, making the differences out to be large, but never ask for the same of opposing Allied equipment.  Here you are asking for Bf109 versions for scenarios for which we largely lack any Allied aircraft having only the Soviet I-16-24 as appropriate.  Even the Hurricane Mk I isn't really appropriate for the BoF due to its 100 octane fuel and variable pitch prop.

Yeah, we axis fighters want more axis planes.  Ummm, this is a surprise?  There are plenty of allied fans asking for allied aircraft.  Notice any pattern here?  This is the wish list forum, where we wish for things.  I certainly defer to those who know about balance and fairness to put new aircraft in to maintain a balance.

Dolby is my friend :)
Wag more, bark less.